Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
28. Apparently my question was quite necessary
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 08:06 PM
Jan 2013

since you still don't seem to have a grasp of what's important here (unless you're just being deliberately obtuse).

Yes, it was a perfectly legitimate legal argument. And obviously, any competent lawyer would have told their clients what their options were, and what could be reasonably argued under the law in their defense. But at that point, the non-hypocritical course for the defendants would have been to say "Even if that's the law, we don't want to base our defense on that argument, because it goes against a fundamental principle of Catholic teaching and belief. We want you to take another tack, even if it means we might lose."

And yes, everyone is guilty of hypocrisy at some point. More stating of the obvious. But "everyone" doesn't try to influence the actions of lawmakers the world over, or to dictate the moral behavior or restrict the legal rights of billions of people with regard to the very principles that they are hypocritical about. The Catholic Church does. Which is why their hypocrisy particularly bears pointing to. If you're interested in a "genuine conversation", feel free to start there.

And btw...no one needs to "portray" the Catholic Church as hypocrites. They do a fine job all by themselves.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Here's a less histrionic report. rug Jan 2013 #1
Maybe they should go on "Dancing with the Stars"! DryRain Jan 2013 #3
Oh, and the hospitals skepticscott Jan 2013 #5
Claiming that the Catholic Church should have any "moral authority" is like... DryRain Jan 2013 #2
You do know you're not responding to the title of the article. rug Jan 2013 #4
Hair-splitting of the kind that the RCC decries skepticscott Jan 2013 #7
"A fetus is not a person if it costs us money, says Catholic Church" DryRain Jan 2013 #9
Yes, that is the better headline because it underscores the actual issue. rug Jan 2013 #10
And that hypocrisy is directly related skepticscott Jan 2013 #12
Hardly. Do you understand the difference between hypocrisy, competence and moral authority? rug Jan 2013 #16
The RCC has been morally bankrupt since, oh, right around its beginning. trotsky Jan 2013 #6
Oh, but it's sooooooooo hard to leave skepticscott Jan 2013 #8
According to Colorado law... pokerfan Jan 2013 #11
+1 Dawson Leery Jan 2013 #31
Hypocrisy not being against the law, perhaps it is just as common in lawsuits as it is struggle4progress Jan 2013 #13
Who said anything skepticscott Jan 2013 #14
Your objection seems to be that the lawyers' argument is inconsistent with struggle4progress Jan 2013 #15
It should, however, cut off any attempt by CHI to object to providing contraception muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #17
I'm not a lawyer, but I doubt your conclusion. Lawyers are hired to argue that their clients struggle4progress Jan 2013 #19
I'm not saying they have extra culpability in this case muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #21
The lawyers may simply be reciting the law. rug Jan 2013 #22
Again, I'm pointing out that they lack the moral convictions they claim for the anti-Obamacare stuff muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #23
That also is the current state of the law. rug Jan 2013 #26
What "is the current state of the law"? muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #27
At the moment, the ACA cases are breaking that corporate employers cannot claim religious liberty rug Jan 2013 #30
I doubt that any court would have interest in your pov: the case here seems to be revolve around struggle4progress Jan 2013 #34
One more time: I'm saying this hurts their claim that they have an objection to abortion muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #35
One last time: they are different entities. rug Jan 2013 #36
I think that proves my point: muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #37
Not really. As it stands now, CHI has no moral conviction; it's a corporation. rug Jan 2013 #43
It *claims* it has moral convictions; hence the quotes in my post (nt) muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #44
That's where the hypocrisy comes in. rug Jan 2013 #45
This is exactly the point. trotsky Jan 2013 #39
You state the obvious, but not the point skepticscott Jan 2013 #18
Well, of course. You dislike the Catholic church, so are pleased whenever possible struggle4progress Jan 2013 #20
Superiority to an organization that has protected and enabled pedophiles, trotsky Jan 2013 #24
If you suspect any defendants in this case are pedophiles, or have shielded pedophiles struggle4progress Jan 2013 #33
I see you've shifted the goalposts. trotsky Jan 2013 #38
The thread concerns a case involving a hospital run by a nonprofit, whose name includes the word struggle4progress Jan 2013 #40
The evidence is the church itself now backpedaling. trotsky Jan 2013 #41
Here's someone else you can argue with: trotsky Jan 2013 #46
Apparently my question was quite necessary skepticscott Jan 2013 #28
If it is your view, that the law must be applied to people whom you consider hypocrites differently struggle4progress Jan 2013 #32
That's not my view skepticscott Jan 2013 #47
Aaaaah-hahahaha! Iggo Jan 2013 #25
Matthew 6 21: For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also....n/t dimbear Jan 2013 #29
No church, and especially the RCC, has any moral authority. None. At. All. cleanhippie Jan 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Catholic Church's mor...»Reply #28