“Atheist pro-lifer”? Not an oxymoron

[cbayer]

41. Well, it's an interesting question.

I would look at it from another angle as well. Since there is evidence that it is the most disenfranchised that are most likely to be religious and that that is the same population least likely to have access to family planning resources, one could make the following argument. That population is more likely to have more children. In that case, there may be more children raised in families with religious beliefs than not.

But then you would have to ask if these same people are more likely to have religious beliefs that include decidedly non-progressive positions, like being anti-choice or anti-GLBT.

I'm not sure about that.