Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

napoleon_in_rags

(3,992 posts)
42. Yeah, good question.
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 08:40 PM
Jan 2013

In the Latino case, you have a fair amount of kids born without a lot of money, in a probably Catholic setting, who are supporting Dems and progressive causes.

I had a friend many years ago who wrote a poem with a line : "God is the drug that gets you through the 24 [hours]" That always stuck in my head. When I view it from a personal level, I can understand why people in hard times are religious. Its that hope. For instance in situations with a high infant mortality rate, I can understand the comfort that comes with the belief that some kids "just got to go to heaven early", how that could keep you going. And I think those forms of faith will always condemn certain behaviours: Everybody is a little gay, a little voyeuristic, a little something "sinful". In the hardest times, we make sense of the world by thinking of it as a punishment for our actions or desires. It returns to us a sense of being control where before there was none. The condemnation of groups who have the same attributes we blame ourselves for is the side effect of that.

Yeah, the study I linked to shows kids getting more and more individual as time goes on. I think that may be the answer, people are dynamic, people change. That may be the factor that keeps the world progressive: personal growth. If so, that's a powerful thing to know: We should be fostering it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This should come as no surprise. cbayer Jan 2013 #1
They received some interesting reactions. rug Jan 2013 #3
No true scotsman! cbayer Jan 2013 #5
She doesn't understand the science of reproduction, apparently. MADem Jan 2013 #2
There's no willing womb involved in a pregnancy that's the result of rape. rug Jan 2013 #4
It doesn't matter what the reason for the pregnancy is. If the woman does not want to be pregnant, MADem Jan 2013 #7
Then your analogy fails. rug Jan 2013 #8
What analogy? I'm am pro-choice, plain and simple. It's not your business and it's not mine. MADem Jan 2013 #10
Your analogy about reproduction. rug Jan 2013 #11
It's about an "atheist pro-lifer" who claims that a clump of cells is a human being because MADem Jan 2013 #20
This is interesting. rug Jan 2013 #23
When the clump of cells forms a body and brain and can live outside a host. MADem Jan 2013 #24
I noticed you called this classic wedge-driving below. rug Jan 2013 #25
I don't know. I do know that a bit of vociferous argument occurred over Obama MADem Jan 2013 #27
That was not a one-time thing if you've been following along. rug Jan 2013 #31
Because I have google. This woman is very suddenly everywhere. nt MADem Jan 2013 #34
There is no reproduction without gestation nt Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #29
Why is that? cbayer Jan 2013 #6
Something smells "off" to me. MADem Jan 2013 #9
Oh, she definitely has an agenda. cbayer Jan 2013 #13
She wouldn't be the first atheist who is anti-Obama. rug Jan 2013 #16
Of course. Probably the worst political pro-lifer in history was atheist Ceaucescu. Nevertheless, LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #12
shouldn't that be atheist anti-choicer? n/t 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #14
If they're advocating repeal as well, yes. rug Jan 2013 #15
Where does it say that lack of belief in gods requires support for abortion? mr blur Jan 2013 #17
It doesn't. Why you can even be a misogynist xenophobe as well. rug Jan 2013 #18
Nowhere, but she is meeting some pretty heated resistance from some within the cbayer Jan 2013 #19
This is CLASSIC wedge-driving. She wants to appeal to "jaded youth" who adapt a sarcastic, MADem Jan 2013 #21
You could be right and time will most likely tell. cbayer Jan 2013 #32
I'd settle for a world okasha Jan 2013 #22
If the fundies in Congress wouldn't make it difficult and expensive for women MADem Jan 2013 #26
A moment of Devil's advocacy: napoleon_in_rags Jan 2013 #28
If current trends continue tama Jan 2013 #30
Man, I should have gone Amish. Its all about the beards. nt napoleon_in_rags Jan 2013 #43
I can't for the life of me figure out how you see a pro-life agenda cbayer Jan 2013 #33
Its honestly more of a hypothetical question. napoleon_in_rags Jan 2013 #36
Good points, but I doubt you mean to suggest that abortion be outlawed cbayer Jan 2013 #38
abortion should not be outlawed. napoleon_in_rags Jan 2013 #40
Well, it's an interesting question. cbayer Jan 2013 #41
Yeah, good question. napoleon_in_rags Jan 2013 #42
I saw an interesting documentary on the religious beliefs of African American slaves. cbayer Jan 2013 #44
Hey, nice little boat GIF. napoleon_in_rags Jan 2013 #45
I think self determination is a great term. cbayer Jan 2013 #46
Ever since I knew of the Log Cabin Republicans, nothing surprises me anymore. 2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 #35
The correct response is 'So?' uriel1972 Jan 2013 #37
But...but...but... IT"S AN ATHEIST THAT THINKS THAT WAY!!!!!!!!!!! cleanhippie Jan 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»“Atheist pro-lifer”? Not ...»Reply #42