Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
29. Wrong, you put a political spin on a medical term in #20.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 09:23 PM
Jan 2013
20. Only if you accept the right wing re-definition of 'abortifacient'

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What a mess. cbayer Jan 2013 #1
I still think the ultimate result will be Catholic hosptals closing or selling. rug Jan 2013 #2
I'm not so sure about that. I think they will find a way around it. cbayer Jan 2013 #3
What about those states that have contraception coverage requirements already? Freddie Jan 2013 #4
Got any links to those states and statutes? rug Jan 2013 #6
28 states including CA & NY Freddie Jan 2013 #9
Whew, there's a lot on that site. Can you point me in the right direction cbayer Jan 2013 #10
www.guttmacher.org/statecenter Freddie Jan 2013 #13
RU-486 is permitted under the ACA. rug Jan 2013 #11
'permitted', perhaps, but not required muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #18
But it does require coverage of abortifacients. rug Jan 2013 #19
Only if you accept the right wing re-definition of 'abortifacient' muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #20
Then you must believe 57% of U.S. OBs are rightwing. rug Jan 2013 #21
Could be; it was British dictionaries and an encyclopedia I used muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #22
I'm not a biologist but the only political issue is whether it should be legal. rug Jan 2013 #23
How contraception and abortion is paid for is also a political issue muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #24
Biology is not "right wing" or left wing. rug Jan 2013 #25
Of course abortifacients shouldn't be banned muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #26
So, a right winger is someone who subordinates facts to ideology. rug Jan 2013 #27
You did, in #19 (nt) muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #28
Wrong, you put a political spin on a medical term in #20. rug Jan 2013 #29
You were acccepting the right wing redefinition muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #30
I'm accepting the obstetricians' definition. rug Jan 2013 #32
You're agreeing with 57% of American obstetricians in a survey muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #35
Lol. So, the political party determines the fact, not the science. rug Jan 2013 #41
No, that's not the only issue; in fact, it's not actually one of the issues at hand here muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #43
Contraception, as well as abortifacients, are part of the litigation. rug Jan 2013 #46
"witch hunting"? You asked the question first. After I answered it, I asked you, twice muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #47
You yourself brought it up and asked iit in#30. rug Jan 2013 #48
Can you read your posts #6, #11, #19 and #25? muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #49
Of course I can. rug Jan 2013 #50
#25 muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #51
The litigation is about abortifacients. rug Jan 2013 #52
Since I have shown that the re-definition was indeed a right wing move muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #53
Oh, now you say I'm championing Bush? rug Jan 2013 #54
Moroever... LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #55
I'm curious as to which states those are and what kind of language cbayer Jan 2013 #7
Here: rug Jan 2013 #12
Thanks so much. Looks like 28 states have requirements similar to ACA. cbayer Jan 2013 #14
That narrows it done. rug Jan 2013 #15
Right. I would think that if they have complied without dissent, it would cbayer Jan 2013 #16
Exactly. rug Jan 2013 #17
As you pointed out skepticscott Jan 2013 #5
If they wish to maintain the affiliation they do. rug Jan 2013 #8
the usual religious crap Skittles Jan 2013 #31
Yea, all that religious stuff is such crap cbayer Jan 2013 #33
Yes, it cetainly is. cleanhippie Jan 2013 #34
religion is not required for charity Skittles Jan 2013 #36
No it's definitely not, but many religious people and organizations are focused cbayer Jan 2013 #37
again, RELIGION IS NOT NEEDED for charity, civil liberties, social justice, environmental issues Skittles Jan 2013 #38
No, it's not, but it's still there anyway cbayer Jan 2013 #39
yes and don't we ALL know it Skittles Jan 2013 #40
One last thing (then you can have the last word) cbayer Jan 2013 #42
and I prefer doing the right thing because it is simply the right thing Skittles Jan 2013 #44
Aw, jeez, I said I was done, but I have to say one more thing. cbayer Jan 2013 #45
Trying to deny people the right to birth control is indeed crap... LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #56
Completely agree. cbayer Jan 2013 #57
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»A Flood of Suits Fights C...»Reply #29