A Flood of Suits Fights Coverage of Birth Control

[rug]

41. Lol. So, the political party determines the fact, not the science.

You are clearly missing the point.

The issue - the only issue - is whether abortifacients should be either included in the ACA and/or banned.

The political issue is not whether pregnancy begins at fertiliation or implantation.

Let me ask you this: if the HHS reverses its rule and adopts the majority view, that it is at implantation, does that make a difference? So what. The political question remainds the same.

Meanwhile you, in full witch-hunting mode trying to layer politics on science, are ignoring the fact that these questions are in litigation right now. The question is political and the solution is political. The issue for the courts is this: If abortifacients are legal there is no cognizable legal basis to exempt an employer from providing coverage for its employees.

I suggest you broaden your data beyond your dictionary and encyclopedia.