Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Concepts of God and Religion [View all]
Last edited Sat Feb 16, 2013, 04:53 PM - Edit history (1)
Concepts of God and Religion, and The Nature of God
Introduction
It is no wonder that there raging conflicts over the name and nature of God, over Gods will, over religion, over religious prophecies, and over whether God even exists or not.
Its no wonder because most people do not understand the real nature of God, or the true purpose of religion, and that is especially true of all those on the extreme opposite sides of the conflict and argument Atheists who dont believe in God, and Theocrats who want to rule in the name of God.
Therefore, what is needed is a rational, reasonable analysis distinguishing between competing concepts of God and religion, and the true nature of God.
In many of the Judeo-Christian traditions, which must be addressed because they are the most widespread and widely followed, the concept of God is as an almighty superman magician who is the creator of all that is, who makes everything happen. And he is often depicted as a man with a long beard an image reminiscent of how Zeus from Greek mythology is depicted.
However, even though one can reach the conclusion that God is an Almighty Superman by reading the texts of Judaism and Christianity, in which the Lord God Jehovah is referred to as He and Him and Jesus of Nazareth is quoted as calling God our Father in heaven, there is ample evidence in the texts of both Judaism and Christianity that contradicts that idea, and reveals that God is not a man, nor a son of man.
(Continued at Concepts of God and Religion, and The Nature of God)
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have tried to say the same thing WAAAAY less elegantly, and with way more words, here on DU.
patrice
Feb 2013
#9
I don't feel a need to prove anything to you. I'm tired & need to go look for work so here's a riff:
patrice
Feb 2013
#14
No, it's a general observation of the state of discourse on the topic, not an analysis, and words
patrice
Feb 2013
#16
Thank you, SarahM32, it's not easy sticking my head up like this and at least trying to do
patrice
Feb 2013
#35
Agree about how one decides what's, more or less, true. But it's not my job to "get" OP or you
patrice
Feb 2013
#48
CHOOSE that or don't. Let others do the same. None of that means anyone should not stand
patrice
Feb 2013
#51
Here's a source for, "science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
Jim__
Feb 2013
#11
Well, it would help if the site had the correct translation of the Tetragamaton
intaglio
Feb 2013
#4
No, the author is not a fundamentalist. The message makes that abundantly clear.
SarahM32
Feb 2013
#21
"not the god of Pat Robertson, Franklin Graham and other fundamentalists, but the real God..."
mr blur
Feb 2013
#60
I hate posts like this that get basic facts wrong or make erroneous assumptions...
Humanist_Activist
Feb 2013
#26
Considering the anachronistic nature of so many religious texts, to think prophecy...
Humanist_Activist
Feb 2013
#57
Nice thread, All! Bookmarking & I promise to explore later. MUST get on the treadmill now &
patrice
Feb 2013
#50
"How can an All Faiths Coalition be a cult?" How can a Unification Church be a cult? (nt)
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#76
"As the messenger says, it's the message that's important, not the messenger."
cleanhippie
Feb 2013
#80
Nothing but that, and of course your incessant referral to "the message." Yes, cultish, indeed.
cleanhippie
Feb 2013
#81
False assumptions and accusations were predicted, and are according to prophecies.
SarahM32
Feb 2013
#84