Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Religion and evolution [View all]
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
86. You're the one who offered up the fine-tuning argument
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:48 PM
Jan 2012

as part of your post, so apparently you think it matters. So why are you now giving a ringing endorsement to someone calling the whole thing "STUPID"?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Religion and evolution [View all] Thats my opinion Jan 2012 OP
#6 is very bigoted Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #1
And it contradicts all the others. Except #2 -- the "anthropic fallacy." immoderate Jan 2012 #2
Anthropic principle tama Jan 2012 #6
Anthropic fallacy: "Isn't it amazing that we are here, to be amazed that we are here?" immoderate Jan 2012 #42
Yes, it is amazing and wonderful to be tama Jan 2012 #46
The anthropic principle Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #9
""It would be very difficult to explain why..." mr blur Jan 2012 #28
And perhaps tama Jan 2012 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author GliderGuider Mar 2012 #97
#3 and 5 are sorta OK. #4 is a trap. immoderate Jan 2012 #3
So these things link religious "faith" and science...how, exactly? skepticscott Jan 2012 #4
I find it easier. No RW Cristian has been able to refute me, yet. There is always a yet. Festivito Jan 2012 #5
A "mystical" interpretation tama Jan 2012 #10
And the holy lobsters of beingness love the joy of qi. dmallind Jan 2012 #14
Isn't qi just melted butter? OriginalGeek Jan 2012 #68
Does that have anything to do with what I said? Festivito Jan 2012 #15
Does anything you said have to do with the OP? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #22
I think so. Are you just jumping in to create a little mess? Festivito Jan 2012 #33
It has nothing to do with what *anybody* has ever said dmallind Jan 2012 #79
Ugh... jeepnstein Jan 2012 #29
I feel for you. Festivito Jan 2012 #31
All I know is.... PassingFair Jan 2012 #41
How does your church explain the two different stories of creation in Genesis? spin Jan 2012 #49
Got nothing for you. jeepnstein Jan 2012 #50
I don't attend church... spin Jan 2012 #51
Churches that don't struggle with this... jeepnstein Jan 2012 #57
Hmm tama Jan 2012 #52
I'll get back to you when I have all the answers. jeepnstein Jan 2012 #56
Yup tama Jan 2012 #58
Right! nt Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #60
This might interest you: tama Jan 2012 #61
These are two very different traditional stories Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #59
I agree... spin Jan 2012 #62
These questions are raised thousands of times every week all across the globe. Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #77
I quess that fundamentalist churches never mention... spin Jan 2012 #82
NIV?! Pish! Liberal rag! OriginalGeek Jan 2012 #70
But you do make a good point... spin Jan 2012 #75
I don't agree with 6 either tama Jan 2012 #7
I posted this not to argue for it Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #11
It's a dear hobby of mine tama Jan 2012 #13
And none of that makes them any more "right" about it. cleanhippie Jan 2012 #30
#2 is wrong. laconicsax Jan 2012 #8
Coincidence and consequence tama Jan 2012 #12
99% of solar system's mass supports life Bad Thoughts Jan 2012 #87
Hmmmm... rrneck Jan 2012 #16
God lit the fuse, crouched down in a hole, butt facing the bomb, arms over his head... hunter Jan 2012 #17
heh... rrneck Jan 2012 #18
Do you mean this? hunter Jan 2012 #20
Yeah! I couldnt get to post right for shit. rrneck Jan 2012 #21
An interesting list of premises. ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #19
Interesting meaning given to #2 tama Jan 2012 #24
Your sauna friend is probably a Kenneth Burke fan. ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #40
Kenneth Burke is a great unknown to me tama Jan 2012 #43
Checked Burke tama Jan 2012 #45
A question on premises #3 and #4. Jim__ Jan 2012 #23
From what I know of Collins Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #32
Thanks. - n/t Jim__ Jan 2012 #38
Some unwarranted assumptions in his list... Humanist_Activist Jan 2012 #25
I do not speak for Collins. He speaks for himself, Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #34
As a null hypothesis, atheism is the only legitimate position unless... Humanist_Activist Jan 2012 #54
Stated very well: "unscientific bias that cannot be reconciled with his profession" MarkCharles Jan 2012 #55
Like tama Jan 2012 #67
I must admit: half of your posts I fail to MarkCharles Jan 2012 #71
Why not both? nt tama Jan 2012 #72
Very simply, whatever they are meant as, MarkCharles Jan 2012 #73
Thanks tama Jan 2012 #76
I used to teach preaching in a seminary. Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #78
"used to teach preaching in a seminary" That explains MarkCharles Jan 2012 #81
So speaks tama Jan 2012 #83
Do you know anything about Newt Gingrich? or is HE superior to you? MarkCharles Jan 2012 #84
No tama Jan 2012 #89
I have made a commitment Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #88
Beauty tama Jan 2012 #26
The question of beauty raises an interesting arena for discussion. Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #35
Beauty, divinity, science bananas Jan 2012 #48
On Collins' very WEAK 6th argument: MarkCharles Jan 2012 #27
Humans are also unique in ways that defy evolutionary explanation, AlbertCat Jan 2012 #36
Collins suggests that the moral law is unique among humans. Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #37
Evidently you are unfamiliar with the research. MarkCharles Jan 2012 #39
Good post tama Jan 2012 #44
So, basically what this thread comes down to is:... MarkCharles Jan 2012 #53
The God I believe in is beyond human understanding... spin Jan 2012 #63
I wouldn't call it a god tama Jan 2012 #66
It's the Knob-Twiddling God o' the Gaps again! onager Jan 2012 #64
Nothing to bite tama Jan 2012 #65
You truly don't see the fallacy, do you? skepticscott Jan 2012 #69
Where have I claimed tama Jan 2012 #74
right on Tama! nt Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #80
You're the one who offered up the fine-tuning argument skepticscott Jan 2012 #86
"Premise as a discussion point tama Jan 2012 #91
In other words, relevant skepticscott Jan 2012 #93
Yes tama Jan 2012 #94
You tried to discredit the notion skepticscott Jan 2012 #85
In that case tama Jan 2012 #90
Yes, the misunderstanding was yours skepticscott Jan 2012 #92
Hawking does not seem to believe Thats my opinion Jan 2012 #95
Creation and Evolution Rel100stu Mar 2012 #96
True, but mr blur Mar 2012 #98
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Religion and evolution»Reply #86