Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,661 posts)
7. Reagan legacy lingers in Afghanistan, Pakistan
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 06:32 PM
Feb 2013

Jun 15, 2004
By M B Naqvi

... The state of Afghanistan has actually been destroyed, and the blame for it lies, to an indeterminate extent, on Reagan's thoughtless but enthusiastic support of the Afghan jihad throughout the 1980s. He fomented and abated the rise of religious extremism in Pakistan that is now threatening this country's stability ...

But what was being done in Afghanistan was done through the help and instrumentality of the Pakistan army. The first requirement of the 1979 war in Afghanistan was people imbued with anti-communist zeal. Pakistan helped manufacture as well as mobilize the Islamic extremists and trained and indoctrinated them into first-rate mujahideen.

The war was fought in the bogus name of Islam, funded and led mainly by the US government, though nominally by Afghanistan and Pakistani mujahideen ...

The Islam that Pakistanis knew was recognized on all sides, even by dictators, as being able to countenance democracy and all fundamental rights. But in the 1980s, the official propaganda by General Zia ul-Haq, the darling of Reagan and the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), was that Islam and democracy could not go together ...


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FF15Ak02.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And as expected, crickets from the theists. cleanhippie Feb 2013 #1
Hey, it's a very "complex" issue skepticscott Feb 2013 #2
I expect everyone here opposes criminalization of religious or irreligious views, struggle4progress Feb 2013 #4
Even if "everyone here" does oppose that skepticscott Feb 2013 #5
The military dictatorship added the blasphemy law to the Constitution in 1986, so one can struggle4progress Feb 2013 #6
And how would they have justified skepticscott Feb 2013 #8
They wouldn't have justified a blasphemy law... LeftishBrit Feb 2013 #10
Well, unless Allah or Mohammed skepticscott Feb 2013 #11
Your framing is most unwise: no one in Pakistan, for example, could argue against the blasphemy struggle4progress Feb 2013 #12
That would, however, be a complete mischaracterisation of the law muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #13
Human Rights First Submission to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights struggle4progress Feb 2013 #14
Your political analysis seems naive to me. It is, first of all, entirely clear that politicians struggle4progress Feb 2013 #15
"it is to argue that the real object of the blasphemy law is not actually to fight blasphemy" muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #16
How to commit blasphemy in Pakistan struggle4progress Feb 2013 #17
Nice try, but without religion, there is no blasphemy. trotsky Feb 2013 #18
"overwhelmingly being used to persecute religious minorities and settle personal vendettas" muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #19
You omit to notice that the law requires government action for its operation and struggle4progress Feb 2013 #20
"your intervention in this thread seems to be an attempt to divert blame away from the religious.." cleanhippie Mar 2013 #23
Reagan legacy lingers in Afghanistan, Pakistan struggle4progress Feb 2013 #7
Pakistan ambassador to US faces blasphemy probe struggle4progress Feb 2013 #3
It's about theocratic religion LeftishBrit Feb 2013 #9
The Kafkaesque reality of Pakistan's blasphemy laws struggle4progress Mar 2013 #21
Without religion, there is no blasphemy. trotsky Mar 2013 #22
Vague laws, operating opaquely, so that the accused may never even know the alleged factual basis struggle4progress Mar 2013 #24
And yet without religion, there is no blasphemy. trotsky Mar 2013 #25
And ... there would be no blasphemy laws if there were no laws! struggle4progress Mar 2013 #26
And yet in the end, without religion, there can be no blasphemy. trotsky Mar 2013 #27
I expect you'll never be troubled by having too many ideas or by the resulting problem struggle4progress Mar 2013 #28
I guess the only thing you have left now is to insult my intelligence. trotsky Mar 2013 #30
*snork* struggle4progress Mar 2013 #33
Pastor in Pakistan Released on Bail After Blasphemy Accuser Admits to Mistake struggle4progress Mar 2013 #29
... trotsky Mar 2013 #31
The prosecution here refused to drop the case after the complaint was withdrawn: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pakistani Ambassador To T...»Reply #7