Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,010 posts)
14. Human Rights First Submission to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 08:04 AM
Feb 2013

Universal Periodic Review: Pakistan 2012

... The laws serve to stifle discussion and dissent; spark outbreaks of mob violence; violate freedom of religion, thought or belief; and are used as a weapon to settle private disputes ... Such abuse is supported by legal procedures wherein allegations of blasphemy require neither proof of intent nor the presentation of evidence. Bail is often denied, and there is no punishment for rendering false allegations ... Pakistan’s blasphemy laws provide a context in which the government and non-state actors can prevent the peaceful expression of political or religious views, including those on the role of religion in law, society, and the state. By restricting those essential freedoms in the name of protecting religion from defamation, the government is able to stifle the healthy debate and discussion of ideas and essentially determine which ideas are acceptable and which are not. Politicians, teachers and students, clergy and congregants, writers and journalists, web and social media users, religious converts and others have suffered prosecution for exercising their right to freedom of expression ... The loose and unclear language of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws — along with procedures which allow private individuals to initiate blasphemy cases without prosecutorial or judicial review — provide dangerous ammunition to those who have used them to victimize individuals and as a weapon in private disputes. Accusations of blasphemy are often the byproducts of disputes between neighbors, colleagues, political opponents, religious and academic leaders, and business associates whose dealings have become adversarial. Given the severity of the punishment provided under these laws, the ease with which one may initiate a proceeding raises serious concerns of due process and the right to a fair trial ... On April 10, 2011, Gulzar Masih, a Christian book store owner and his son were forced to flee their home after being accused of blasphemy by a former business rival. On April 5, 2011, Arif Masih was arrested after being falsely accused of tearing pages from the Koran. The accusations stemmed
from a land dispute with a neighbor. Scores of cases of this nature have been filed ...
pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And as expected, crickets from the theists. cleanhippie Feb 2013 #1
Hey, it's a very "complex" issue skepticscott Feb 2013 #2
I expect everyone here opposes criminalization of religious or irreligious views, struggle4progress Feb 2013 #4
Even if "everyone here" does oppose that skepticscott Feb 2013 #5
The military dictatorship added the blasphemy law to the Constitution in 1986, so one can struggle4progress Feb 2013 #6
And how would they have justified skepticscott Feb 2013 #8
They wouldn't have justified a blasphemy law... LeftishBrit Feb 2013 #10
Well, unless Allah or Mohammed skepticscott Feb 2013 #11
Your framing is most unwise: no one in Pakistan, for example, could argue against the blasphemy struggle4progress Feb 2013 #12
That would, however, be a complete mischaracterisation of the law muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #13
Human Rights First Submission to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights struggle4progress Feb 2013 #14
Your political analysis seems naive to me. It is, first of all, entirely clear that politicians struggle4progress Feb 2013 #15
"it is to argue that the real object of the blasphemy law is not actually to fight blasphemy" muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #16
How to commit blasphemy in Pakistan struggle4progress Feb 2013 #17
Nice try, but without religion, there is no blasphemy. trotsky Feb 2013 #18
"overwhelmingly being used to persecute religious minorities and settle personal vendettas" muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #19
You omit to notice that the law requires government action for its operation and struggle4progress Feb 2013 #20
"your intervention in this thread seems to be an attempt to divert blame away from the religious.." cleanhippie Mar 2013 #23
Reagan legacy lingers in Afghanistan, Pakistan struggle4progress Feb 2013 #7
Pakistan ambassador to US faces blasphemy probe struggle4progress Feb 2013 #3
It's about theocratic religion LeftishBrit Feb 2013 #9
The Kafkaesque reality of Pakistan's blasphemy laws struggle4progress Mar 2013 #21
Without religion, there is no blasphemy. trotsky Mar 2013 #22
Vague laws, operating opaquely, so that the accused may never even know the alleged factual basis struggle4progress Mar 2013 #24
And yet without religion, there is no blasphemy. trotsky Mar 2013 #25
And ... there would be no blasphemy laws if there were no laws! struggle4progress Mar 2013 #26
And yet in the end, without religion, there can be no blasphemy. trotsky Mar 2013 #27
I expect you'll never be troubled by having too many ideas or by the resulting problem struggle4progress Mar 2013 #28
I guess the only thing you have left now is to insult my intelligence. trotsky Mar 2013 #30
*snork* struggle4progress Mar 2013 #33
Pastor in Pakistan Released on Bail After Blasphemy Accuser Admits to Mistake struggle4progress Mar 2013 #29
... trotsky Mar 2013 #31
The prosecution here refused to drop the case after the complaint was withdrawn: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pakistani Ambassador To T...»Reply #14