Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Pope enthralls large crowd with message of love, mercy [View all]Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)50. Flogging dead horses, again.
More tu quoque bullshit.
My position is this: dropping money in the collection plate funds an organization which in no small part works against the progressive principals of equality, secularism, and reproductive freedom, as well as going towards efforts to cover up or otherwise evade punishment for the rape of minors.
This is not a command. This is not a suggestion. This is an observation. If what I do personally affects others' ability to evaluate this observation on its own merits, the problem lies between their ears, not in my tax returns.
So you would be willing to go on financing an organization whose policies you do not approve to avoid unpleasant consequnces. Conscience ends where discomfort begins.
Why stop with taxes, then?
If you don't agree with where the United States is going, you could always just up and leave. Living here is a choice, after all.
If you don't like working long, back-breaking hours for a pittance, then just quit. Working is a choice, as long as you don't mind the "discomfort" of not having money to feed yourself. But rest assured, eating is a choice, too. As long as you don't mind the "discomfort" of dying.
If anyone here were to make such suggestions honestly, they'd be ridiculed and promptly tombstoned.
The consequences of some decisions are such as to probabilistically exclude them from consideration. It is unrealistic to expect people not to eat. It is unrealistic to expect people to accept imprisonment. It is unrealistic to expect people to endanger the lives and well-being of their loved ones. Any choice that as a consequence expects one to deny oneself the essential necessities of life, freedom, or the safety and well-being of those important to them is hardly a choice at all.
And you compare this to the wholly voluntary act of church collections, for which the consequences of non-compliance are measurably nonexistent.
The comparison is wholly invalid.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"people who, on the one hand want to listen to Jesus, but, on the other hand..."
trotsky
Mar 2013
#1
Most of what I saw was outrage directed at ostensibly progressive people...
Act_of_Reparation
Mar 2013
#8
Very disappointing to see intelligence such as yours used to alienate and disparage nt
Xipe Totec
Mar 2013
#12