Religion
In reply to the discussion: Religious circumcision ritual leaves 2 Brooklyn infants with herpes [View all]Heddi
(18,312 posts)where the doctor does not put his herpes-infected mouth on the penis of the infant, giving the infant a herpetic infection of the genitals?
While it's not "forcing any beliefs on anyone," it's certainly forcing a lifetime infection of HERPES on these INFANTS.
I repeat, since it seems to be getting missed in the cacophony of "THIS IS RELIGION AND RELIGION IS GOOD NO MATTER WHAT!!" apologetic nonsense,
THESE INFANTS WERE GIVEN HERPES. GENITAL HERPES. THEY WERE GIVEN HERPES BY GROWN MEN WHO HAD HERPES INFECTIONS AND GAVE THE INFANTS HERPES BECAUSE THEY PUT THEIR HERPES-LADEN LIPS ON THE PENISES OF INFANTS IN A RITUALISTIC BLOOD-SUCKING EXERCISE.
THESE INFANTS WITH HERPES WILL GROW UP TO BE ADULTS WITH HERPES. HERPES TRANSMISSION IS NOT STOPPED OR DECREASED BY CONDOMS. IT IS TRANSMITTED BY SKIN-TO-SKIN. ORAL SEX CAN TRANSMIT HERPES. KISSING CAN TRANSMIT HERPES. MUTUAL MASTURBATION CAN TRANSMIT HERPES
THESE GROWN MEN INFECTED INFANTS WITH HERPES. THERE IS NO CURE FOR HERPES. THEY WILL HAVE HERPES FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES AND THEY WILL MOST LIKELY INFECT ANYONE THEY HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH. ANY WOMAN/WOMEN THAT ARE INFECTED WITH HERPES WILL MOST LIKELY HAVE TO GIVE BIRTH VIA C-SECTION BECAUSE OF THE INCREASED RISK OF TRANSMITTING GENITAL HERPES TO *THEIR* CHILDREN DURING CHILDBIRTH
Sounds a FUCK of a lot like imposing some beliefs on someone to me. Or, imposing their herpetic lesions to the penises to unconsenting infants who probably, when grown and given the option, really woudln't want to have to live with a lifetime of herpes outbreaks and taking anti-virals to decrease the outbreaks.
But hey, it's just religion, right? No harm!