Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Thats my opinion

(2,001 posts)
23. Who is they and what gods were you talking about? Nobody I know,
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 01:43 PM
Apr 2013

and I have a pretty wide knowledge of the people who planned this event, and NOBODY would take your snarky definition seriously. If you are going to make sarcastic comments about anybody perhaps you might take a look at what they actually believe.

No one of any persuasion should have been be excluded. What is the evidence that they were blocked at the door?

Just curios how would they know someone is a non-believer? still_one Apr 2013 #1
How about we just assume some people are, and make things like this... trotsky Apr 2013 #2
They said the two women were members of a non-theist organization wryter2000 Apr 2013 #3
More discouraging news about our Country. nt ladjf Apr 2013 #4
OK, link doesn't work so who exactly refused to allow participation? sinkingfeeling Apr 2013 #5
Atheists Say Boston Prayer Organizers Snubbed Them struggle4progress Apr 2013 #25
They should have attended anyway. And, if they were physically restrained, it would ladjf Apr 2013 #6
Nonbelievers were not excluded from attending. Jim__ Apr 2013 #10
Link's broken. This one works - pinto Apr 2013 #7
Thanks for that. Jim__ Apr 2013 #9
since their god(s) allowed the explosion they were afraid of truth tellling? nt msongs Apr 2013 #8
Who is they and what gods were you talking about? Nobody I know, Thats my opinion Apr 2013 #23
Who said they were blocked at the door? Act_of_Reparation Apr 2013 #26
Yet more evidence xfundy Apr 2013 #11
so no one asked them? madrchsod Apr 2013 #12
I find it hard to believe that no phone calls were returned. rug Apr 2013 #13
I don't. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2013 #14
Why yes, you asserted a belief without evidence. rug Apr 2013 #15
So it is your position they should have provided evidence for the nonexistence of returned calls? Act_of_Reparation Apr 2013 #18
So, what did they say? rug Apr 2013 #19
To be fair, it was you who suggested the calls were not returned. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2013 #20
I look forward to the update. rug Apr 2013 #22
Here is a more revealing article Act_of_Reparation Apr 2013 #32
Could it have something to do... rexcat Apr 2013 #16
so wearingly typical.. Phillip McCleod Apr 2013 #17
I agree they should have been able to participate. hrmjustin Apr 2013 #21
I have my doubts about this. georges641 Apr 2013 #24
You misunderstand Act_of_Reparation Apr 2013 #27
Did you get an aswer to your email? rug Apr 2013 #28
As I stated... Act_of_Reparation Apr 2013 #30
So who represents the non-believing community? georges641 Apr 2013 #29
Again, you are mistaken Act_of_Reparation Apr 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Nonbelievers Excluded fro...»Reply #23