Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

rug

(82,333 posts)

7. The tension is not simply between job duties and religious beliefs.

Reply to rocktivity (Reply #1)

Sun Apr 21, 2013, 01:16 PM

Apr 2013

The owners of these facilities have a dual obligation; one to their workers and one to their patients. In most instances both can be accommodated. In those cases where the essential nature of the job prohibits a believer from performing those functions, the relligious belief should compel that worker to seek work elsewhere. Otherwise, it is the employer' obligation to accommodate them. It is not a straight black and white line.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill Allows Refusal Of Health Care On Moral Basis [View all] rug Apr 2013 OP

If it's wrong to force people to act against their religious beliefs rocktivity Apr 2013 #1

Exactly. enlightenment Apr 2013 #2

Often it's the job description that changes. Igel Apr 2013 #6

The tension is not simply between job duties and religious beliefs. rug Apr 2013 #7

I come down on the side of the "black and white line" rocktivity Apr 2013 #14

Oh snap. Apophis Apr 2013 #12

I'd steer clear of christian scientist hospitals. Warren Stupidity Apr 2013 #3

What about 7th Day Adventist? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #4

What if refusing care breaks the hippocratic oath? EvolveOrConvolve Apr 2013 #5

Tort law trumps the Hippocratic Oath. rug Apr 2013 #9

I guess I was referring to the ethical issues rather than the legal issues EvolveOrConvolve Apr 2013 #15

I think they'd have a problem with the first sentence. rug Apr 2013 #16

Hey, that can't be skepticscott Apr 2013 #8

Do you think conscientious objection is per se bad? rug Apr 2013 #10

No, you haven't skepticscott Apr 2013 #11

Neither have you. rug Apr 2013 #13

Given that it's Michigan, I wonder if they'd apply a similar law outside of the medical profession. Jim__ Apr 2013 #17

That's a good point. Why legislate conscience exemptions only in health care? rug Apr 2013 #18

There is a difference LostOne4Ever Apr 2013 #19

If you can't set aside your religion to interact with larger society and perform essential job... Humanist_Activist Apr 2013 #20