Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: An Atheist Muslim's Perspective on the 'Root Causes' of Islamist Jihadism... [View all]Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)12. i get the need for that distinction.. less need here than on 'atlas shrugs'..
..but 'we' must *continue* to be clear on this point.. it's one thing to criticize religious belief and quite another to target believers just because they believe. once they *act* on those beliefs in the public sphere, however.. then yeh they too may legitimately become targets for criticism. pat robertson. mother theresa.. of course, osama bin laden became a target for *more* than mere criticism.
once one has made that distinction clear, however, and as long as one doesn't prove oneself a liar.. it should be the end of the subject.
instead, it inevitably becomes the topic of conversation.. it's such a convenient way to shield religion from criticism. simply attack it's critics as being 'bigoted'.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
An Atheist Muslim's Perspective on the 'Root Causes' of Islamist Jihadism... [View all]
Silent3
May 2013
OP
i get the need for that distinction.. less need here than on 'atlas shrugs'..
Phillip McCleod
May 2013
#12
Because there is no consistency between Muslims. If there were consistancy then there
snagglepuss
May 2013
#38
Highly recommended. A reminder that religion isn't harmful until you take it seriously.
dimbear
May 2013
#3
Not sure Muxin was saying that those who "misinterpret" Muslim texts are not true Muslims
Meshuga
May 2013
#35
Not sure he claimed others were no true Muslims for having the wrong interpretation
Meshuga
May 2013
#64
It doesn't matter that extremists have an idiotic understanding of Islam. What matters is that they
snagglepuss
May 2013
#32
Not all philosophies and ideologies have so much, er, let's generously call it "ambiguous"...
Silent3
May 2013
#65
Whether you're trying to make anyone believe your interpretation is besides the point
Silent3
May 2013
#70
So, you are saying that believing any given dogma does not necessarily lead to overt violence.
LiberalAndProud
May 2013
#79
Can you point me to where Rizvi claims that Jihadism represents Islam's best practice?
LiberalAndProud
May 2013
#80
Of course it goes without saying that not all religious people are violent.
LiberalAndProud
May 2013
#92
You've probably seen a set of books called the Interpreters' Bible, which blows the
dimbear
May 2013
#28
"criticism of religion isn't a demonstration of bigotry but a struggle against it."
snagglepuss
May 2013
#29