Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Today is Ascension Thursday! [View all]cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)30. Were the Romans not known for their extensive recordkeeping?
Would they not have noted a major event such as an earthquake and people rising from their graves and milling about smartly?
27:52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
27:53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.
27:54 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.
27:53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.
27:54 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.
Ok, I admit defeat. You got me. The Romans did not document everything. But they did document extensively. And they didn't document this major event, most likely because it didn't happen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
201 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What accounts are there of Jesus interacting with the public post-resurrection?
cleanhippie
May 2013
#1
The Gospels have accounts of appearances to the Apostles but no mass sightings.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#2
The religion forum is open to skeptics. If you want to post about zombies and not be challenged
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#17
yes, that is the forum where we dont have to put up with religious nonsense
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#21
So you believe that one should not celebrate religion in the religion group?
Fortinbras Armstrong
May 2013
#73
If you consider questioning dubious claims as sneering, then the problem lies with you.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#33
Suggest you ask him to produce the documents recording the trials and crucifixions
okasha
May 2013
#13
And what does this have to do with dead people coming back to life without a single documentation
cleanhippie
May 2013
#26
"It is my understanding that the Romans documented everything." Post number 5
hrmjustin
May 2013
#36
He didn't say they documented everything, he said it was his understanding that they did.
trotsky
May 2013
#43
Well gee yup, he was totally wrong about that since they didn't document their bowel movements.
trotsky
May 2013
#49
Sure we can move on. The only evidence to date of any of this to this point is the bible.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#51
Faith in God is not far-fetched. The reality something created us. Why not a God.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#70
No really it isn't as it explains nothing, it just adds an additional unnecessary step.
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#121
The New York Times is in the habit of publishing book reviews by people who didn't read the book.
rug
May 2013
#133
I am not asking for automatic respect but I do not think I deserve not to be respected
hrmjustin
May 2013
#134
I think it is a good thing to have your faith challenged. This is why I post here.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#138
To think that anyone has suggested such a thing smacks of persecution complex.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#162
Yes, I hear you saying that, but need you to help me understand where that happened.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#163
Read every one of Warren Stupidity's responses to me in this thread and you will see it.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#164
Well I am sorry but I am not going to say my beliefs are not as good as anyone elses.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#171
Beliefs, however unfounded they may be, are as good as objective observation?
cleanhippie
May 2013
#172
If unfounded beliefs are inferior to objective reality, what is your point?
cleanhippie
May 2013
#174
But you demand that we accept your "matters of faith" as equally valid
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#182
I make no demands on you. All I ask that you treat me with a bit more respect.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#184
No trostky I have no problem when you challenge me, what I have a problem is when someone
hrmjustin
May 2013
#167
So by that standard alone I must dismiss all of the History of Rome written by Livy
Leontius
May 2013
#90
I did respond to your original question. You just didn't get the answer you wanted.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#178
You are partially right I didn't get an answer. I got some vague talking points
Leontius
May 2013
#187
Asking the question I await your answers. If you can't provide them just admit it.
Leontius
May 2013
#190
Okay so you have nothing to add here and you can't get back the time you wasted
Leontius
May 2013
#194
What have you added? Nothing. Except to toss out asinine questions and refuse to give an answer
cleanhippie
May 2013
#195
You may now show you have even a modicum of my integrity by apologizing for slandering me.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#68
Yep. Just as everyone thought, you took the same course and ran away in shame.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#96
Graves opening is not literal. It meant the souls of the dead have risen, nnot their actual
hrmjustin
May 2013
#37
so some of the description is literal, others not, and when cornered you get to declare
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#38
27:53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared u
cleanhippie
May 2013
#42
I believe the souls of the dead were resurrected. I believe Jesus was bodily resurrected.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#46
No I don't. I just believe it was the soul not the body. I did not say they did not see it.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#62
Nope. Classic cherry picking going on. This part of the fable is literal, that part isn't.
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#59
I am sorry you feel that way but I take it to mean the souls of the dead. But if it was the bodies
hrmjustin
May 2013
#60
People are free to believe all manner of absurd things. Why does this belief
cleanhippie
May 2013
#71
I'm no expert on this, and as I mentioned in another post, there was a Jewish writer
goldent
May 2013
#93
Your talking points are outdated. All four written during the time in which those involved
Leontius
May 2013
#107