Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Today is Ascension Thursday! [View all]cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)168. From that you inferred that I wanted you to shut up?
Really?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
201 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What accounts are there of Jesus interacting with the public post-resurrection?
cleanhippie
May 2013
#1
The Gospels have accounts of appearances to the Apostles but no mass sightings.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#2
The religion forum is open to skeptics. If you want to post about zombies and not be challenged
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#17
yes, that is the forum where we dont have to put up with religious nonsense
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#21
So you believe that one should not celebrate religion in the religion group?
Fortinbras Armstrong
May 2013
#73
If you consider questioning dubious claims as sneering, then the problem lies with you.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#33
Suggest you ask him to produce the documents recording the trials and crucifixions
okasha
May 2013
#13
And what does this have to do with dead people coming back to life without a single documentation
cleanhippie
May 2013
#26
"It is my understanding that the Romans documented everything." Post number 5
hrmjustin
May 2013
#36
He didn't say they documented everything, he said it was his understanding that they did.
trotsky
May 2013
#43
Well gee yup, he was totally wrong about that since they didn't document their bowel movements.
trotsky
May 2013
#49
Sure we can move on. The only evidence to date of any of this to this point is the bible.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#51
Faith in God is not far-fetched. The reality something created us. Why not a God.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#70
No really it isn't as it explains nothing, it just adds an additional unnecessary step.
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#121
The New York Times is in the habit of publishing book reviews by people who didn't read the book.
rug
May 2013
#133
I am not asking for automatic respect but I do not think I deserve not to be respected
hrmjustin
May 2013
#134
I think it is a good thing to have your faith challenged. This is why I post here.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#138
To think that anyone has suggested such a thing smacks of persecution complex.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#162
Yes, I hear you saying that, but need you to help me understand where that happened.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#163
Read every one of Warren Stupidity's responses to me in this thread and you will see it.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#164
Well I am sorry but I am not going to say my beliefs are not as good as anyone elses.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#171
Beliefs, however unfounded they may be, are as good as objective observation?
cleanhippie
May 2013
#172
If unfounded beliefs are inferior to objective reality, what is your point?
cleanhippie
May 2013
#174
But you demand that we accept your "matters of faith" as equally valid
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#182
I make no demands on you. All I ask that you treat me with a bit more respect.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#184
No trostky I have no problem when you challenge me, what I have a problem is when someone
hrmjustin
May 2013
#167
So by that standard alone I must dismiss all of the History of Rome written by Livy
Leontius
May 2013
#90
I did respond to your original question. You just didn't get the answer you wanted.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#178
You are partially right I didn't get an answer. I got some vague talking points
Leontius
May 2013
#187
Asking the question I await your answers. If you can't provide them just admit it.
Leontius
May 2013
#190
Okay so you have nothing to add here and you can't get back the time you wasted
Leontius
May 2013
#194
What have you added? Nothing. Except to toss out asinine questions and refuse to give an answer
cleanhippie
May 2013
#195
You may now show you have even a modicum of my integrity by apologizing for slandering me.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#68
Yep. Just as everyone thought, you took the same course and ran away in shame.
cleanhippie
May 2013
#96
Graves opening is not literal. It meant the souls of the dead have risen, nnot their actual
hrmjustin
May 2013
#37
so some of the description is literal, others not, and when cornered you get to declare
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#38
27:53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared u
cleanhippie
May 2013
#42
I believe the souls of the dead were resurrected. I believe Jesus was bodily resurrected.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#46
No I don't. I just believe it was the soul not the body. I did not say they did not see it.
hrmjustin
May 2013
#62
Nope. Classic cherry picking going on. This part of the fable is literal, that part isn't.
Warren Stupidity
May 2013
#59
I am sorry you feel that way but I take it to mean the souls of the dead. But if it was the bodies
hrmjustin
May 2013
#60
People are free to believe all manner of absurd things. Why does this belief
cleanhippie
May 2013
#71
I'm no expert on this, and as I mentioned in another post, there was a Jewish writer
goldent
May 2013
#93
Your talking points are outdated. All four written during the time in which those involved
Leontius
May 2013
#107