Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Tue May 14, 2013, 06:57 PM May 2013

Why Atheist Redditors Are Stuck On the Internet [View all]

Sam Brounstein
in Media & Tech, Internet
2 hours ago

For those unfamiliar with the term "lurking" as it pertains to the internet, the formal definition is, according to Wikipedia, “a member of an online community who observes, but does not actively participate.”

If you have ever lurked Reddit, the web’s largest aggregated post-and-comment board, you may notice atheism is a very popular subject. Its category or "subreddit" is one of the most subscribed, and most post-rich on Reddit. The great irony of this highly trafficked area of thought is birthed by its internal contradiction, how it stretches the gap between the championing of rational thought, and the rants, “gotcha!” style rage comics, Facebook captions, and other anecdotal jabs. For a group so active on the internet, this seemingly enthused crowd is more likely to "lurk" in real life than confront, no matter how much they disagree by the faith-based existence around them.

Are we to make cowards out of Reddit’s atheists for the discrepancy between the prevalence of real life and internet proclamations of godlessness? Maybe, as the world’s loudest atheist, Richard Dawkins, first bemoaned in his TED talk, “Atheists do not want to be impolite … Can we stop being so damned polite?” Or, as R/atheist stalwart with the username “blackstar9000” explained in a very thoughtful post on the state of the atheist subreddit, “Many of the users are just recently converted, who fear being ostracized by people the religious people who make up their support system.” Perhaps Dawkins was being a bit unsympathetic in his own right. Religion, as a point of conversation, is about as volatile as it gets.

Unfortunately, the cognitive dissonance between redditor and reality will persist, as long as the faith based argumentation of the religious, and the sometimes irate complaining of Atheists mix like so much water and oil. Until then, the atheists of the internet are participating in a discourse that is suited better for their entertainment than a polemic attempt at confronting the religious.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/41797/why-atheists-redditors-are-stuck-on-the-internet

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The writer's wording is offensive Promethean May 2013 #1
Irrelevant. Any chance to bash atheists is a chance to bash atheists. cleanhippie May 2013 #2
It's primarily bashing reddit and posturing on the internet. rug May 2013 #4
It's primarily just another passive-aggressive atheist bash. cleanhippie May 2013 #12
Yes, I'm familiar with your posting habits. rug May 2013 #13
The author of that article LostOne4Ever May 2013 #3
Ho hum! Yawn! Here we go again with those damned angry atheists. longship May 2013 #5
If I still drank I'd join you. rug May 2013 #6
And you'd be welcome. How about a nice iced tea? longship May 2013 #7
Thanks, as long as it's got lots of sugar. rug May 2013 #8
I've mostly stopped using sugar. Promethean May 2013 #10
mmm. thanks for taking the crust off that piece of wonder bread rug! Phillip McCleod May 2013 #9
I live to serve. rug May 2013 #11
Why? Because of scenes like this: muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #14
There are far worse examples. I've posted some of them. rug May 2013 #15
Professional believers: priests, rabbis, imams, etc. muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #16
It means don't indiscriminately attack everyone like unleashing a haol of buckshot from a shotgun. rug May 2013 #17
'Ministering' is presiding at a religious service muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #18
It's also comforting the ill, visiting the imprisoned and myriad other things. rug May 2013 #19
Why would I have such evidence? My point was that they *do* believe it muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #20
I can't imagine where I got the impression you said their belief was insincere. rug May 2013 #21
No, I couldn't understand where you got the impression, either muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #22
I don't know if I agree with him or not but some have to be a lot smarter about it. rug May 2013 #23
What does "Professional nonbeliever" have to do with this? Lordquinton May 2013 #33
About as much as "professional believer". rug May 2013 #35
The professional believers are given undo prominence by the media and government muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #36
Only if you ignore the topic, then yes. Lordquinton May 2013 #37
This article does nothing but kick down a strawman. backscatter712 May 2013 #24
There is a huge difference between r/atheism and DU. rug May 2013 #25
Is there? We rant and rave and mock Republicans all the time here. backscatter712 May 2013 #26
There's a difference between mocking republicans and mocking the religious beliefs of Democrats. rug May 2013 #27
"There's a difference between mocking republicans and mocking the religious beliefs of Democrats." Goblinmonger May 2013 #28
"Sometimes there isn't." rug May 2013 #29
Each place has its purpose. backscatter712 May 2013 #30
And the two purpose are very different. rug May 2013 #31
Indeed. backscatter712 May 2013 #32
I think the Author of the article should looked up another internet term Lordquinton May 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Why Atheist Redditors Are...»Reply #0