The two big things I think religion provides that secularism does not.

[Moonwalk]

9. In regards to acting ethically (Point 1), you state:

As an atheist, I have to accept that sometimes doing the right thing is not going to be rewarded. I've heard Richard Dawkins argue that this means that only atheists are genuinely capable of ethical behaviour - for the religious it's just a form of deferred self-interested. I'm not sure I buy that...

Certainly religious folk can act ethically not because they fear hell, but because they want to emulate their god(s) and act as those god(s) did (Jesus taking care of the poor, for example).

But then, then the non-religious can do the same. How many of us have said, "I take my example from Ghandi" or Martin Luther King, jr. Atheism doesn't mean that we cut ourselves off from having heroes or role models. We simply don't believe such are magical or supernatural. We may even admire and emulate fictional characters. I know an atheist who loves Superman and often tries to do brave, heroic acts because of that. Does he believe Superman is real? No. He's well aware Superman is fictional. Does that make a difference whether he uses that character as a role model? Not at all.

You are wrong that atheists haven't any reason to act ethically. They have, on the point of role models, the same reason as the religious. They just don't cast the role model in the same "magical" light as the religious. That's point 1 on secularists being ethical (or not ethical) as the religious.