Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

cbayer

(146,218 posts)

8. I would guess that the hospitals and other healthcare systems are income

Reply to rug (Reply #7)

Thu Feb 2, 2012, 04:39 PM

Feb 2012

producers for the church, so they might be very reluctant to let them go. The downside for the public is that they have traditionally provided more indigent or reduced cost that the for profits.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Taking Liberties [View all] rug Feb 2012 OP

Sucks for them.. Either operate as a public function or forfeit public monies... makes sense to me. glowing Feb 2012 #1

So, as I read it, Catholic Hospitals and service agencies don't wish to... MarkCharles Feb 2012 #2

Explain to me how this affect even one single persons religious freedom. Just one. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #3

What liberty is being taken? darkstar3 Feb 2012 #4

Why are posting this garbage?? Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #5

It's going to be really interesting to see how this plays out in the courts. cbayer Feb 2012 #6

The Church will have to divest itself from the health care industry. rug Feb 2012 #7

I would guess that the hospitals and other healthcare systems are income cbayer Feb 2012 #8