Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
20. You are describing a deliberate attempt to evade church state separation
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:16 AM
Jun 2013

By a school administration. That is not the same situation at all. This was not an attempt by a government organization to promote religion, it was an individual exercising his free speech rights at a public function. Is there overlap? Yes of course, if the school administration was complicit in using valedictorian speeches to promote religion, that would cross the line. But that was not this case.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They both did the right thing. ZombieHorde Jun 2013 #1
Oh Happy Day! nt goldent Jun 2013 #2
Actually, I'm offended that students must have pre-approved speeches. NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #3
They are representing the school (state) and talking to a captive audience LostOne4Ever Jun 2013 #8
My best friend in high school was valedictorian. NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #14
I am fine with assholes exercising their free speech. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #4
Apparently not in this context. longship Jun 2013 #5
This only applies to courts in the Ninth Circuit Leontius Jun 2013 #9
Didn't SCOTUS let the opinion stand? longship Jun 2013 #10
Still not binding in all circuits they may or may not rule the same or give it precedence. Leontius Jun 2013 #11
Hmm. If there are discrepancies between districts. longship Jun 2013 #12
It's not quite that simple goldent Jun 2013 #17
The issue was the graduation. longship Jun 2013 #21
He is acting as a representative of the government skepticscott Jun 2013 #15
I totally disagree. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #16
It is not a matter of his being honored skepticscott Jun 2013 #19
You are describing a deliberate attempt to evade church state separation Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #20
"He is acting as a representative of the government" goldent Jun 2013 #18
Huh... TlalocW Jun 2013 #6
Good. Thats boring NoOneMan Jun 2013 #7
They cut the mic because his comments were not pre-approved. rug Jun 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»After This Christian Vale...»Reply #20