Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
21. The issue was the graduation.
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:37 AM
Jun 2013

The ceremony gave the student's speech sanction and therefore was coercive.

Click the link in my post.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They both did the right thing. ZombieHorde Jun 2013 #1
Oh Happy Day! nt goldent Jun 2013 #2
Actually, I'm offended that students must have pre-approved speeches. NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #3
They are representing the school (state) and talking to a captive audience LostOne4Ever Jun 2013 #8
My best friend in high school was valedictorian. NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #14
I am fine with assholes exercising their free speech. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #4
Apparently not in this context. longship Jun 2013 #5
This only applies to courts in the Ninth Circuit Leontius Jun 2013 #9
Didn't SCOTUS let the opinion stand? longship Jun 2013 #10
Still not binding in all circuits they may or may not rule the same or give it precedence. Leontius Jun 2013 #11
Hmm. If there are discrepancies between districts. longship Jun 2013 #12
It's not quite that simple goldent Jun 2013 #17
The issue was the graduation. longship Jun 2013 #21
He is acting as a representative of the government skepticscott Jun 2013 #15
I totally disagree. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #16
It is not a matter of his being honored skepticscott Jun 2013 #19
You are describing a deliberate attempt to evade church state separation Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #20
"He is acting as a representative of the government" goldent Jun 2013 #18
Huh... TlalocW Jun 2013 #6
Good. Thats boring NoOneMan Jun 2013 #7
They cut the mic because his comments were not pre-approved. rug Jun 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»After This Christian Vale...»Reply #21