Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Creationist Science Fair [View all]

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
41. I understand, and that would be complete rejection of science for a particular instance.
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 11:45 AM
Jun 2013

There are no two ways about this. The natural laws of the universe cannot be suspended. Anyone who says that they can be, especially by some outside-the-natural-laws-of-the-universe-supernatural-entity is rejecting science in it's entirety.

You said that you are scared of those that reject science. YOU also reject science (at least in THIS particular case), what makes you any less scary than those that scare you?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Creationist Science Fair [View all] cleanhippie Jun 2013 OP
Reminds me of the girl LostOne4Ever Jun 2013 #1
Creationist Science Fair.....an oxymoron Curmudgeoness Jun 2013 #2
Here's a little encouragement to excel at that sort of thing: dimbear Jun 2013 #3
that's warped. here's the guidelines.. Phillip McCleod Jun 2013 #5
From the AiG Statement of Faith pokerfan Jun 2013 #10
Anyone who thinks the Flintstones is how it really happened scares the hell out of me. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #4
Me too. PotatoChip Jun 2013 #6
At least half edhopper Jun 2013 #8
Well I've never met one so therefore they don't exist. trotsky Jun 2013 #11
Yikes. 46% is a disturbingly high amount. PotatoChip Jun 2013 #12
Keep in mind, it's 46% of *all Americans*. trotsky Jun 2013 #17
Umm. PotatoChip Jun 2013 #19
Many people do. trotsky Jun 2013 #21
Why? cleanhippie Jun 2013 #7
Science tells us that it did not happen that way and they reject that. That scares me. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #9
Science tells us a person cannot be clinically dead for 24+ hours and come back to life. trotsky Jun 2013 #13
NO I do not reject the virgin birth. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #14
OK, just wondering if you had a double standard. trotsky Jun 2013 #16
I disagree but you can think what you want. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #18
It's not a matter of what I think. trotsky Jun 2013 #20
I did not say it wasn't ok for them to believe what they want, I just say they scare me. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #22
They scare you because they reject science? trotsky Jun 2013 #23
I do not reject science. I just believe that Jesus Christ was the Messiah and that the hrmjustin Jun 2013 #24
QED n/t trotsky Jun 2013 #25
I have answered your questions, if you have more you know where to find me. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #26
Science says that people don't come back from the dead skepticscott Jun 2013 #29
I do not reject science. I believe the laws of nature were basically not in effect for Jesus Christ. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #30
Science says that laws of nature can't be suspended skepticscott Jun 2013 #31
I do not reject science! hrmjustin Jun 2013 #32
Yes, you do! You reject it in favor of your belief. cleanhippie Jun 2013 #34
When it comes to Jesus I believe the laws of nature were lifeted by God. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #36
I understand, and that would be complete rejection of science for a particular instance. cleanhippie Jun 2013 #41
Ok than be scared of me. All I can tell you I disagree that with you that I reject science. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #43
Not scared of you, but you are, in fact, rejecting science for belief. cleanhippie Jun 2013 #44
Well I am glad you are not scared of me. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #45
You have yet to explain why you are scared of them but no one need be scared of you for rejecting cleanhippie Jun 2013 #46
The evidence for evolution is clear and they reject that. It scares me that they think it is a hrmjustin Jun 2013 #47
Have a great time. Talk to you when you return. cleanhippie Jun 2013 #48
Thanks my friend! hrmjustin Jun 2013 #49
About the whole death thing..... Marrah_G Jun 2013 #37
"Science"? Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #51
From some of the conversations you and I have had... cleanhippie Jun 2013 #27
No I don't think so but you have to make that choice. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #28
You have rejected scientific knowledge and the physical laws of the universe in favor of a belief. cleanhippie Jun 2013 #33
I am scared of them because of the politics and anti-gay views that usually comes with creationists. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #35
Now you have changed the reason why you are scared of them. First it was their rejection of science cleanhippie Jun 2013 #39
No rejection of science is something to be scared of them. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #40
If you think the laws of physics were suspended by a supernatural force, you are rejecting science. cleanhippie Jun 2013 #42
Why is the kid drawn like a fat stupid kid? rug Jun 2013 #15
Don't forget the flag -- he represents everything the privileged class sees as a lesser person goldent Jun 2013 #38
Well, he may have to look harder for material now. rug Jun 2013 #50
Because it is a cartoon. Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #52
Which means it's drawn deliberately to emphasize physical features that way. rug Jun 2013 #55
Attempting to make a rhetorical, philosophical, or intellectual argument about cartoons is useless. Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #56
I have no problem with political cartoons. rug Jun 2013 #57
Regardless of how you spin or obsess over this cartoon, it is not racist. Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #58
Who's spinning or obsessing? rug Jun 2013 #59
You're still trying to analyze too much. Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #60
This is the fourth post you've made arguing with me over a cartoon. rug Jun 2013 #61
fifth Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #62
How can he get a prize? He's off by 983 years! 2ndAmForComputers Jun 2013 #53
You are correct, but it's just a slip. What he meant to write was the entire lifetime of the earth dimbear Jun 2013 #54
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Creationist Science Fair»Reply #41