Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Part of Reality Cannot be Perceived [View all]Boojatta
(12,231 posts)18. Before I disagree with anything that you wrote, clarification might be helpful.
Each human mind is a realm
If each human mind is a separate realm, then we can ask what if anything is the connection between a concept in one person's mind and a concept in another person's mind. After all, it seems that shared concepts are a prerequisite for communication. For example, hearing spoken language of no apparent significance isn't enough to allow an infant to acquire language. An infant is spoken to and hears other people speak to each other in contexts involving various kinds of non-verbal interaction.
What was your motivation for choosing the word "realm" in the above excerpt? I see mental functioning as necessarily involving change, an active process. Of course, we might describe somebody as having been "mentally passive" at some time, but I think that is a relative matter. Consider an analogy: running involves an active process, and as bipeds we need an active balancing process merely to stand still, but lying still is inactive and isn't analogous to any mode of mental functioning. Even the unconscious mind dreams.
Each human mind is a realm that contains mental representations of our experiences. The human mind has representations of a circle, circumference and diameter. Our mind also has the ability to mentally rearrange our experiences.
In the above excerpt, does the word "experiences" include not only perceptions, but also conceptions? If thinking is an experience, then the word "experiences" already encompasses the conceptual realm. In that case, it wouldn't make sense to suggest that the mind merely stores and rearranges perceptions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We don't understand enough about human ideas to reach any conclusions about alien ideas.
Jim__
Feb 2012
#5
A mental representation of pi, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.
Jim__
Feb 2012
#9
Before I disagree with anything that you wrote, clarification might be helpful.
Boojatta
Feb 2012
#18
Who decides for me what's a "true conception" and what's a "misconception"?
GliderGuider
Feb 2012
#24
I didn't point to something in particular and assert that it's a misconception.
Boojatta
Feb 2012
#25
Do I "surely" believe that such a thing as a misconception actually exists?
GliderGuider
Feb 2012
#26