Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(15,054 posts)
23. Can you envision a 4 dimensional sphere?
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 04:41 PM
Feb 2012

I can't. I can picture a circle or a 3 dimension sphere. I believe the difference is that I have experience with 2 and 3 dimensional space. I don't have any experience with 4 dimensional space. But, if our ideas come from a "realm of ideas" rather than from our experience, why can't I picture a 4-dimensional sphere?

If each human mind is a separate realm, then we can ask what if anything is the connection between a concept in one person's mind and a concept in another person's mind. After all, it seems that shared concepts are a prerequisite for communication. For example, hearing spoken language of no apparent significance isn't enough to allow an infant to acquire language. An infant is spoken to and hears other people speak to each other in contexts involving various kinds of non-verbal interaction.


The connection between a concept in one person's mind and the same concept in another person's mind is common experience, with one person being able to enhance the experience of another person through communication. For instance, if each of two people has a concept of an elephant and of the color pink, then person A can claim to have seen a pink elephant, and person B, even though she has never seen a pink elephant, will have an understanding of what person A means, even though her concept of a pink elephant may not exactly match what person A is claiming to have seen.

I don't believe that a person born blind has any experience of the color blue. I don't believe that I can describe blue to him in such a way that he can experience it. I can tell him about the interval of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans perceive as blue, and I believe that he can grasp that. But, I don't believe he can experience blue.

What was your motivation for choosing the word "realm" in the above excerpt?


Basically, it was a response to what you said: If there is a realm of ideas, then there can be a human mental representation of an idea. However, if there is no realm of ideas, then there is nothing to be represented. The human mind can serve as the realm of ideas.

Each human mind is a realm that contains mental representations of our experiences. The human mind has representations of a circle, circumference and diameter. Our mind also has the ability to mentally rearrange our experiences.


In the above excerpt, does the word "experiences" include not only perceptions, but also conceptions? If thinking is an experience, then the word "experiences" already encompasses the conceptual realm. In that case, it wouldn't make sense to suggest that the mind merely stores and rearranges perceptions.


It includes direct perceptions and modified versions of perceptions - modified either through conversations with others, or through mental rearrangement of perceptions. An example of mental rearrangement of perceptions would be someone who had seen an ellipse, but not a circle; yet that person can modify his image of an ellipse by making the major axis and minor axis be equal in length and so can conceive of a circle even though he has never seen one.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by the mind merely stores and rearranges perceptions. I believe the mind does store and rearrange perceptions; but it does much more than that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not clear what this has to do with religion. Deep13 Feb 2012 #1
A certain pattern of reasoning is repeatedly used Boojatta Feb 2012 #2
Glad I mentioned it... Deep13 Feb 2012 #14
A couple of things Boojatta Feb 2012 #20
The sentence following "one recent example." Deep13 Feb 2012 #27
Does this have a link or did you, as OP make this up? There are... MarkCharles Feb 2012 #3
"Ideas can be ..." Boojatta Feb 2012 #4
I am impressed. Boojatta Feb 2012 #22
We don't understand enough about human ideas to reach any conclusions about alien ideas. Jim__ Feb 2012 #5
And tama Feb 2012 #7
I'm not sure what point you are making. Jim__ Feb 2012 #10
Very simple tama Feb 2012 #11
It's not so much that neural networks manifest in our experience as ... Jim__ Feb 2012 #12
Funda-Mental tama Feb 2012 #17
Mental representation of what? Boojatta Feb 2012 #8
A mental representation of pi, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. Jim__ Feb 2012 #9
Before I disagree with anything that you wrote, clarification might be helpful. Boojatta Feb 2012 #18
Can you envision a 4 dimensional sphere? Jim__ Feb 2012 #23
3D and anthropic principle tama Feb 2012 #28
The brain doesn't care pscot Feb 2012 #6
been here done this deacon_sephiroth Feb 2012 #13
Did I post in that thread by Rug? Boojatta Feb 2012 #15
Now the world of imagination is boundless..... yes it is. AlbertCat Feb 2012 #30
Throws Kant's "Critique Of Pure Reason" at OP Odin2005 Feb 2012 #16
Cultural agreements about the nature of reality GliderGuider Feb 2012 #19
The following should be taken at face value, not as a veiled insult. Boojatta Feb 2012 #21
Who decides for me what's a "true conception" and what's a "misconception"? GliderGuider Feb 2012 #24
I didn't point to something in particular and assert that it's a misconception. Boojatta Feb 2012 #25
Do I "surely" believe that such a thing as a misconception actually exists? GliderGuider Feb 2012 #26
Within Australian aboriginal culture for example, "song lines" or "dreamtracks" are accepted as real AlbertCat Feb 2012 #29
"Are they real?" is a culturally determined question. GliderGuider Feb 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Part of Reality Cannot be...»Reply #23