Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

cbayer

(146,218 posts)

31. You might want to read my responses in this thread before putting words in my mouth

Reply to cpwm17 (Reply #30)

Sun Jul 14, 2013, 07:57 PM

Jul 2013

and taking another exchange completely out of context.

Thanks in advance.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In Russia It Is Now a Crime to Insult Someone's Religious Feelings [View all] cbayer Jul 2013 OP

From what I've seen on DU, trotsky Jul 2013 #1

I would oppose such a law. el_bryanto Jul 2013 #3

Do you believe people have a right to not be offended? trotsky Jul 2013 #4

No, Definitely, Sometimes, and Sometimes el_bryanto Jul 2013 #5

Someone is *always* going to be offended no matter what you do. trotsky Jul 2013 #6

Well 2 points el_bryanto Jul 2013 #7

Who defines what respect means? trotsky Jul 2013 #8

2 more points el_bryanto Jul 2013 #9

2 more responses: trotsky Jul 2013 #10

I suppose then I will continue challenging you and disagreeing with you el_bryanto Jul 2013 #13

Go right ahead! trotsky Jul 2013 #15

I post in interfaith still. hrmjustin Jul 2013 #20

Speaking of butthurt, rug Jul 2013 #19

I would oppose it as well. cbayer Jul 2013 #18

Not me! hrmjustin Jul 2013 #11

No, not you. trotsky Jul 2013 #12

Interesting. I wonder who this description could apply to? nt el_bryanto Jul 2013 #14

Not you either. n/t trotsky Jul 2013 #17

I would hope nobody would agree with the sentiment. hrmjustin Jul 2013 #16

Cbayer, is this law something you agree with? cleanhippie Jul 2013 #2

From this exchange, the answer seems to be yes cpwm17 Jul 2013 #30

You might want to read my responses in this thread before putting words in my mouth cbayer Jul 2013 #31

I almost didn't want to make that comment above cpwm17 Jul 2013 #33

That exchange was in a total flamebait thread. Why take my words out of context from cbayer Jul 2013 #35

Yeah, I think you are right. Notice her complete lack of an answer, just obfuscation. cleanhippie Jul 2013 #32

Yes, and that linked exchange shows why separation of church and state is really important cpwm17 Jul 2013 #34

I totally agree with you and again point out that you are taking my previous words out of context cbayer Jul 2013 #36

Russia is drifting back into the system that held at the time of the Czar. dimbear Jul 2013 #21

One person's religion is another's blasphemy... uriel1972 Jul 2013 #22

How can blasphemy be a religion? cbayer Jul 2013 #23

Religion A believes X is true Religion B not only believes X is not true... uriel1972 Jul 2013 #24

Isn't blasphemy a verb, an intentional action taken by a person? cbayer Jul 2013 #25

Okay I get your drift... uriel1972 Jul 2013 #26

I guess it can be a fine line, which is why this law is pretty frightening. cbayer Jul 2013 #27

Blasphemy is a noun Rob H. Jul 2013 #28

You are correct. I think I messed up my point by making that distinction. cbayer Jul 2013 #29