Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Shroud of Turin [View all]edhopper
(33,556 posts)37. i am not clear
That is why I asked. There seems to be a few posters who are trying very hard to refute any of the evidence that has debunked the shroud. So I ask what they think. Do they think the shroud is real?
I think it has conclusively been shown to be a 1000 year old fraud.
A simple straightforward question
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do not have cable but I keep hearing how "The History Channel " is rewriting history
lunasun
Jul 2013
#58
Not to say you're wrong again, scottie, but the term here would be brunaille, not grisaille.
rug
Jul 2013
#17
The only time I'm surrounded by blather is when you go off on one of your usual tangents.
rug
Jul 2013
#51
You know, if you would clear your mind of preconceived notions every so often, you'll do better.
rug
Jul 2013
#30
I' glad to see you approach the study of unusual phenomena with an open mind.
AlbertCat
Jul 2013
#65
There is zero evidence for photographic processes before the 19th century.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2013
#80
Unfortunately that is not visible to me due to the way DU's ignore feature works.
trotsky
Jul 2013
#55