Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Shroud of Turin [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)63. Since you haven't read McCrone's book
and wouldn't have understood it if you did, and since I doubt that any of the sites you've googled trying to patch together a bluff on this made the comparison between his book and Dan Brown's, I can only assume that you pulled that out of your ass.
And please, quote where the article you cited explains the presence of pigment on the shroud. If you can.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do not have cable but I keep hearing how "The History Channel " is rewriting history
lunasun
Jul 2013
#58
Not to say you're wrong again, scottie, but the term here would be brunaille, not grisaille.
rug
Jul 2013
#17
The only time I'm surrounded by blather is when you go off on one of your usual tangents.
rug
Jul 2013
#51
You know, if you would clear your mind of preconceived notions every so often, you'll do better.
rug
Jul 2013
#30
I' glad to see you approach the study of unusual phenomena with an open mind.
AlbertCat
Jul 2013
#65
There is zero evidence for photographic processes before the 19th century.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2013
#80
Unfortunately that is not visible to me due to the way DU's ignore feature works.
trotsky
Jul 2013
#55