Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinto

(106,886 posts)
19. Yeah. They ran it with the "What is Real?" title. Here's what is currently up on the SA website -
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:07 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=physicists-debate-whether-world-made-of-particles-fields-or-something-else

Physicists Debate Whether the World Is Made of Particles or Fields--or Something Else Entirely [Preview]

Physicists speak of the world as being made of particles and force fields, but it is not at all clear what particles and force fields actually are in the quantum realm. The world may instead consist of bundles of properties, such as color and shape

By Meinard Kuhlmann

Physicists routinely describe the universe as being made of tiny subatomic particles that push and pull on one another by means of force fields. They call their subject “particle physics” and their instruments “particle accelerators.” They hew to a Lego-like model of the world. But this view sweeps a little-known fact under the rug: the particle interpretation of quantum physics, as well as the field interpretation, stretches our conventional notions of “particle” and “field” to such an extent that ever more people think the world might be made of something else entirely.

The problem is not that physicists lack a valid theory of the subatomic realm. They do have one: it is called quantum field theory. Theorists developed it between the late 1920s and early 1950s by merging the earlier theory of quantum mechanics with Einstein's special theory of relativity. Quantum field theory provides the conceptual underpinnings of the Standard Model of particle physics, which describes the fundamental building blocks of matter and their interactions in one common framework. In terms of empirical precision, it is the most successful theory in the history of science. Physicists use it every day to calculate the aftermath of particle collisions, the synthesis of matter in the big bang, the extreme conditions inside atomic nuclei, and much besides.

This article was originally published with the title What Is Real?.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=physicists-debate-whether-world-made-of-particles-fields-or-something-else

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A Scientific American article on quantum physics? I am genuinely impressed. cbayer Jul 2013 #1
The article was impenetrable at times. There was stuff like this - pinto Jul 2013 #5
I took 4 years of calculus - no problem, but physics kicked my butt. cbayer Jul 2013 #6
I could never wrap my brain around. AlbertCat Jul 2013 #28
I'll ask this guy. rug Jul 2013 #2
LOL. Is his head to the right or the left? Is water wet? pinto Jul 2013 #3
Looks like refraction in a pool. rug Jul 2013 #4
Thread winner, rug! longship Jul 2013 #9
application of concepts from quantum physics to other areas are almost always nonsense. Warren Stupidity Jul 2013 #7
I don't get what you mean. pinto Jul 2013 #12
Quantum physics describes the nature of physical reality at the micro level. Warren Stupidity Jul 2013 #14
Thanks Warren edhopper Jul 2013 #15
Relevant: trotsky Jul 2013 #17
I read an article. Got some ideas from it. Posted. Probably a mistake to use a religious analogy. pinto Jul 2013 #21
s'okay edhopper Jul 2013 #22
Mostly what I get from delving into modern physics is an appreciation Warren Stupidity Jul 2013 #24
I know what you mean edhopper Jul 2013 #25
Here's the lead of the piece I read - pinto Jul 2013 #20
Yeah, three paragraphs and I'm done. RevStPatrick Jul 2013 #8
Quantum is just the way the universe is. longship Jul 2013 #10
Thanks for the lead, I'll check it out. (aside) I'm peddling nothing here. Honestly. pinto Jul 2013 #11
Yup! But field theory is still the real deal, for now. longship Jul 2013 #13
Interesting edhopper Jul 2013 #16
Is the article "What is Real" by Meinard Kuhlman? Jim__ Jul 2013 #18
Yeah. They ran it with the "What is Real?" title. Here's what is currently up on the SA website - pinto Jul 2013 #19
God? I thought all that was about a cat. MissMarple Jul 2013 #23
Looking forward to reading the August issue exboyfil Jul 2013 #26
Hogwash. Particles are neither unique nor immortal. DetlefK Jul 2013 #27
I understood the article to say structural relations are important and not perspective. Jim__ Jul 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Both of these are true - ...»Reply #19