Religion
In reply to the discussion: A modest proposal [View all]Thats my opinion
(2,001 posts)Trotsky, for a long time you have been one of those whose attacks I have believed are not to open up any discussion in which reasonable people can work through differences, but a categorical condemnation. I know many of my limitations, but failing to communicate well is not one of them. I've got decades of evidence about that.
Yes, I know there are those of you offended by what I have said. But the notion that I continually criticize atheism does not seem on target. Compared to the constant condemnation of all things religious, it is an elephant and rabbit stew--one elephant and one rabbit
The continual reference to something I said in my first post a year ago is curious, although I have answered it repeatedly--even if I did not say what you wanted me to say. I'll try one more time Both religion and non-religion have an essential place in any society. I would not want to live in a society without both. They form an essential corrective to the other. They both can evidence a positive ethic--and both can evidence a negative ethic, and that is why we need both in any society. Do you really have a problem with that repeated answer?
Is it possible in this new forum that we can both be ciivil? I hope so.