Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
9. It has been said by some who frequent this group that being identified as
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 05:58 PM
Aug 2013

something akin to a religious group would be a bad thing. I don't see a particular down side, but others do. It may have to do with not wanting to be associated in any way with institutions and organizations that they have serious issues with.

It's not about rights and protections for atheists, it's about the rights and protections for atheist groups. A good example is getting this atheist chaplain. He's been turned down because he does not have the backing of a religious group. So the military would need to change the definition so that he fit the criteria or the society that represents him would have to make a claim that they fit the definition of a religious group.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Why Congress Cannot Bar a...»Reply #9