Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheism is maturing, and it will leave Richard Dawkins behind [View all]
http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2013/08/atheism-maturing-and-it-will-leave-richard-dawkins-behindIncreasingly, Richard Dawkins' public output resembles that of a man desperately grasping for attention and relevance in a maturing community.
BY MARTIN ROBBINS PUBLISHED 09 AUGUST 2013 12:02

In the olden days, at the turn of the century, it was hard to come by vaguely-racist bigotry in our day-to-day lives. Back then you had to go and visit your grandparents a few times a year, and sit there quietly while they talked about the coloured folk in the corner shop and how you couldnt walk to Sainsburys to buy your Daily Mail without being robbed by a gang of Asians. Then somebody built Twitter, and then Richard Dawkins joined.
@RichardDawkins is the increasingly erratic comedy creation of a bored Oxford Professor called Richard Dawkins. One of the best science writers of the last few decades, Dawkins has succeeding in crafting an online character that ironically parodies the more militant tendencies in capital-A Atheism, serving as a useful reminder for all of us to be more nuanced and tolerant.
Or at least thats the kind interpretation. The alternative is that one of Britains leading intellectuals really has degenerated to the point where he believes that the following is an intelligent argument:
All the world's Muslims have fewer Nobel Prizes than Trinity College, Cambridge. They did great things in the Middle Ages, though.
Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) August 8, 2013
Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) August 8, 2013
Unsurprisingly, a lot of people have found this offensive. It contains no meaningful criticism of religion, nor can it reasonably imply any there are many reasons why the residents of North Africa or the Middle East win less Nobel prizes than Cambridge scholars, just as there are many reasons why more men than women win Nobel prizes. And designated religion is a long way down that list. Besides, on what planet are Nobel Prizes the best metric for achievement or progress?
more at link
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ho-hum, another silly article by someone who wants to organize non believers into a church
Warpy
Aug 2013
#1
Dawkins is, "desperately grasping for attention and relevance in a maturing community?"
immoderate
Aug 2013
#2
Any growing social movement will find reasons to splinter after a bunch of years. They all do.
immoderate
Aug 2013
#29
Sounds like you're all primed for a round of word games. So let's see how clear I can get.
immoderate
Aug 2013
#38
You assert that a commission of "abuse," even a definition, is criminal. That requires equivocation.
immoderate
Aug 2013
#68
Well, you may think that, but I don't think you'll find any data to back that up.
cbayer
Aug 2013
#44
You keep defending him, if that works for you. It's becoming clearer that you have
cbayer
Aug 2013
#73
" Besides, on what planet are Nobel Prizes the best metric for achievement or progress? "
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2013
#6
In which institution does one find the religious bigotry you are attempting to identify?
trotsky
Aug 2013
#20
Institutionalized religious bigotry stopped Islamic countries developing their universities?
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2013
#24
And then claims that it was taken out of context, as if there were any actual context when
cbayer
Aug 2013
#61