Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
16. I don't see why it's offensive.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:52 PM
Aug 2013

Is it offensive when religious people talk about converting people and expanding their churches?

But yes, that is the anti-theist side of Dawkins, which Tyson does not share.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh, the false equivalency of race and religion strikes again. cleanhippie Aug 2013 #1
then Dawkins should have known better DonCoquixote Aug 2013 #28
Being an ass is a matter of opinion. He is factually right about what he says. cleanhippie Aug 2013 #38
about what DonCoquixote Aug 2013 #39
If I take your point correctly, LTX Aug 2013 #66
Dawkins comment is a lament, not a boast. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #2
Are you addressing that to me or the author of this piece? cbayer Aug 2013 #3
Both, because you called that statement bigoted in the other thread. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #4
What did you think about what this author says on the subject? cbayer Aug 2013 #6
I think the author is massively off-base and willfully misinterpreting what Dawkins' said. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #8
He agrees that the statement is factual. cbayer Aug 2013 #9
Just click on the progress bar on the video at 38 minutes. You don't have to watch the whole thing. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #11
I see what you are saying here, but NDT's analysis of this is so much more thoughtful cbayer Aug 2013 #12
Dawkins has elaborated in a couple essays on this matter. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #13
Yes, I saw that he crawfished after the fact. cbayer Aug 2013 #14
BTW, the t-shirt Dawkins is wearing in the link is really offensive. cbayer Aug 2013 #15
I don't see why it's offensive. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #16
If I am trying to make a point that what I said was not bigoted, cbayer Aug 2013 #17
Dawkins position has long been (and this is true of all memetics) that religion is a socially transm AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #21
The argument that one side does it so the other should do it as well is weak. cbayer Aug 2013 #24
Memes propagate just like diseases. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #26
Why doesn't it matter if I find it offensive? cbayer Aug 2013 #29
That is correct, they are all memes. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #32
Wow. Stephen Fry. Now there is an authority on, well, everything. cbayer Aug 2013 #33
I leave 'offense' up to the individual. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #36
Feel free and make sure you wear it around anyone you care about who is a believer. cbayer Aug 2013 #40
Fortunately, none of the people I love are. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #41
No one you love is a believer? cbayer Aug 2013 #42
Religion isn't a race or gender identity, it's an idea. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #44
I completely reject that notion. Do you choose to be an atheist or is cbayer Aug 2013 #46
I'm an atheist by default. I CHOOSE to be anti-theist becuse it impacts my life on a daily basis AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #47
But race and gender identity okasha Aug 2013 #59
Are you equally offended edhopper Aug 2013 #20
I don't like t-shirts in general that tell other people what they should think cbayer Aug 2013 #23
That shirt doesn't tell people 'what to believe'. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #48
I don't really have a problem. The t-shirt says that religion is a disease, cbayer Aug 2013 #49
I don't see how that shirt tells anyone 'what to think' any more than a 'jesus is lord' shirt which AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #50
The ketch is always there for me. cbayer Aug 2013 #51
Must be my browser. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #52
Good grief, Tom Sawyer. okasha Aug 2013 #19
It's not that he "refuses to see the good that religion has done", but rather that he doesn't agree eomer Aug 2013 #22
No. I don't think being religious makes you more likely to do good things, but cbayer Aug 2013 #25
He does see both sides of it. But he makes some further points. eomer Aug 2013 #43
You've got to admit that's some pretty faint praise, particularly cbayer Aug 2013 #45
I've heard... eomer Aug 2013 #54
I've never heard that, but perhaps he would have considered it cbayer Aug 2013 #55
No, it's certainly not rhetorical. eomer Aug 2013 #56
Coretta Scott King disagreed with you about how she and MLK chose their religion. eomer Aug 2013 #57
Fascinating. I had not heard this story before and thank you for sharing it. cbayer Aug 2013 #58
It does say a bit about the depth and breadth of his religious beliefs. eomer Aug 2013 #62
So your argument is that okasha Aug 2013 #64
Probably didn't explain myself very well, need to put a finer point on it. eomer Aug 2013 #67
I think we are on the same page. I think people can be inherently good. cbayer Aug 2013 #65
interesting analyisis, AC Skittles Aug 2013 #53
It was still stupid DonCoquixote Aug 2013 #35
Look at the stats for the last 50 years then. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #61
Excellent article - thanks for posting it! Jim__ Aug 2013 #5
You are welcome. I really like this writer and thought his take on this cbayer Aug 2013 #7
civilizations and religions come and go. madrchsod Aug 2013 #10
Or all the world's women. okasha Aug 2013 #18
So who would have guessed that Dawkins is a bigot Agnosticsherbet Aug 2013 #27
WTF is a biggot? AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #30
It's a typo. Lighten up. cbayer Aug 2013 #34
Fixed. Agnosticsherbet Aug 2013 #37
Oh, I think he is aware. It's just the yardstick that he prefers to use because it is most cbayer Aug 2013 #31
Actually Islamic culture comes up short compared to china Japan and India too. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #60
Keep it up, cbayer. trotsky Aug 2013 #63
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Some Thoughts on Richard ...»Reply #16