Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Anti-Muslim bigotry is pervasive. [View all]

eomer

(3,845 posts)
46. His problem is with faith, which is foundational to and indivisible from Islam, I would think.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 08:51 PM
Aug 2013

I'm not sure whether that constitutes condemning the entire religion or not but I don't see how reframing it that way is helpful in understanding what he said. I would just leave it that what he meant was what he said. But maybe you have a reason for going there?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Dawkins is a self-proclaimed anti-theist. And he seems to be an equal opportunity cbayer Aug 2013 #1
He genuinely does not see his anti-Muslim bigotry. rug Aug 2013 #3
Dawkins was correct on the cited issue. longship Aug 2013 #5
Being factually correct about something doesn't make it ok to use it cbayer Aug 2013 #8
What utter crap edhopper Aug 2013 #25
Thank you get the red out Aug 2013 #26
Where did I say that we should not point out the laws that discriminate against women? cbayer Aug 2013 #27
Complex issue. longship Aug 2013 #2
The problem with you arguments, imo, are the over generalizations. cbayer Aug 2013 #4
I can only judge them by their actions, my friend. longship Aug 2013 #10
I think the problem is attributing the behavior to the religion itself. rug Aug 2013 #6
Well, they claimed it was because of their religious beliefs. longship Aug 2013 #11
And this country has invaded how many countries in the name of democracy? rug Aug 2013 #12
Huh? longship Aug 2013 #13
Perhaps I'm simply more skeptical. rug Aug 2013 #14
No problem. longship Aug 2013 #16
Okay. Let me try again here. longship Aug 2013 #15
So the gender segregation did not occur. Good for Krauss for standing firm. rug Aug 2013 #17
Is that supposed to be a characterization of the tweet that Dawkins made? eomer Aug 2013 #31
It's a recitation of that tweet, his comment about Nobel prizes and about a dozen others. rug Aug 2013 #32
I believe you're mistaken about what you said. eomer Aug 2013 #34
Oh, do you think he has not said the rest? rug Aug 2013 #35
The discussion begins at parsing internet posts, actually. eomer Aug 2013 #40
Indeed there are factions. rug Aug 2013 #41
You're extrapolating too much from that short clip. He does recognize factions. eomer Aug 2013 #42
Well, no. He's distinguishing believers from the religion, not factions within the religion. rug Aug 2013 #43
Yes, factions. eomer Aug 2013 #44
The issue is: Does he condemn the entire religion as inherently evil? rug Aug 2013 #45
His problem is with faith, which is foundational to and indivisible from Islam, I would think. eomer Aug 2013 #46
It does constitute an untenable broad brush. rug Aug 2013 #47
Sorry, how is it broad brush? n/t eomer Aug 2013 #48
"All Islam is evil." rug Aug 2013 #49
More nimbleness on your part in understanding what he's saying is IMO what's missing. eomer Aug 2013 #50
He is not criticizing "specific aspects of Islam"; he's criticizing it in toto. rug Aug 2013 #51
I don't believe he criticizes the giving of wealth to the poor and needy. eomer Aug 2013 #52
He approves alms. rug Aug 2013 #53
No, you have it right. It's just that some NEED to hate him, so they misconstrue facts. cleanhippie Aug 2013 #33
Just to be clear, this whole dust up is not just about his response to that one incident. cbayer Aug 2013 #18
Dawkins is always saying provocative things like that. longship Aug 2013 #19
I think they both provide a valuable service in kicking down some doors cbayer Aug 2013 #20
Nobel winners are white because the US wins an awful lot of them. longship Aug 2013 #21
Just because a religious person does something insane, that does cbayer Aug 2013 #22
I know what you are saying here. longship Aug 2013 #23
It seems that we're about to add another, okasha Aug 2013 #28
It's infuriating. rug Aug 2013 #29
Sectarian violence in Iraq killed 969 people in July, a record month. dimbear Aug 2013 #7
Iraqis are overwhelmingly Muslim. Perhaps you meant anti-Sunni sentiments. rug Aug 2013 #9
There are Muslims, many in fact, who can see that Islam is problematic. dimbear Aug 2013 #24
So, Muslims should renounce Islam since it's problematic. rug Aug 2013 #30
Renounce, reform, review, rework............ there are lots of solutions. dimbear Aug 2013 #36
In that case, you must not consider it inherently evil and harmful. rug Aug 2013 #37
Inherently harmful things harm everything they inhabit, that's the definition. dimbear Aug 2013 #38
You're such an accommodationist. rug Aug 2013 #39
I don't know about his, but it's certainly mine. Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2013 #55
This sentence of yours has a certain hortatory quality. rug Aug 2013 #56
I'm saying that they hold immoral beliefs on certain issues. Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2013 #58
And what should happen to them if they do not do as they should? rug Aug 2013 #59
Depends on the scale. Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2013 #60
I think he makes some good points, and has clearly thought this through, but makes several mistakes Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2013 #54
Solid points, all. rug Aug 2013 #57
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Anti-Muslim bigotry is pe...»Reply #46