Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Anti-Muslim bigotry is pervasive. [View all]eomer
(3,845 posts)46. His problem is with faith, which is foundational to and indivisible from Islam, I would think.
I'm not sure whether that constitutes condemning the entire religion or not but I don't see how reframing it that way is helpful in understanding what he said. I would just leave it that what he meant was what he said. But maybe you have a reason for going there?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dawkins is a self-proclaimed anti-theist. And he seems to be an equal opportunity
cbayer
Aug 2013
#1
Where did I say that we should not point out the laws that discriminate against women?
cbayer
Aug 2013
#27
It's a recitation of that tweet, his comment about Nobel prizes and about a dozen others.
rug
Aug 2013
#32
Well, no. He's distinguishing believers from the religion, not factions within the religion.
rug
Aug 2013
#43
His problem is with faith, which is foundational to and indivisible from Islam, I would think.
eomer
Aug 2013
#46
More nimbleness on your part in understanding what he's saying is IMO what's missing.
eomer
Aug 2013
#50
No, you have it right. It's just that some NEED to hate him, so they misconstrue facts.
cleanhippie
Aug 2013
#33
Just to be clear, this whole dust up is not just about his response to that one incident.
cbayer
Aug 2013
#18
I think he makes some good points, and has clearly thought this through, but makes several mistakes
Donald Ian Rankin
Aug 2013
#54