Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
6. That's a good way to put it.
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 03:33 PM
Sep 2013

But in the end my answer to that question doesn't mean that that it is congenital that I don't believe. I think it probably is congenital but there's no science to confirm or deny it. Therefore, I have to withhold any firm opinion either way. I have to say, I think it is, but I don't really know. I can convince myself that there are counter-examples, too.

This is why Dennett's idea to study these things may be an important one. It's one reason why I support him fairly strongly here.

Another aspect of the claim is that it tends to delve fairly deeply into the murky waters of evolutional psychology which is a controversial subject in its own right.

So, I have to just shrug in spite that I personally think it very well may be true.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»After a Crisis of Faith, ...»Reply #6