Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: You don't have a soul... [View all]bluerum
(6,109 posts)18. Wow. That's a lot to read into that short simple quote.
Frankly, I think you have an ax to grind. So have at it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps your assumptions about what a soul might be are more narrow than Lewis's?
patrice
Feb 2012
#4
At minimum, it is clear that I referred to a "possibility" so you tell me why you refer to that as
patrice
Feb 2012
#31
You may have noticed that #8 made that accusation and I asked a question about that accusation. nt
patrice
Feb 2012
#34
Said an inhabitant of the infinitely regressive mirror world. Speaking of tautologies, btw... nt
patrice
Feb 2012
#39
It WAS a hypothetical analogy. If the shoe doesn't fit ... So, why do you insist on wearing it?
patrice
Feb 2012
#33
Deflection. Avoidance. You need to tell DU -ers they are not permitted to challenge you.
patrice
Feb 2012
#40
I parried your passive aggressive thrust. I'm really not interested in continuing down that line.
darkstar3
Feb 2012
#43
Perhaps, if you are God, you can assume those things absolutely. If you're not, there's
patrice
Feb 2012
#20
Whether it is a tautology or not depends upon how one relates to that which is referred
patrice
Feb 2012
#28
We don't disagree about the definiton of "tautology". We disagree about what is referred to by
patrice
Feb 2012
#37
Seems a simple observation. So easily overlooked and ignored in our daily lives.
bluerum
Feb 2012
#7
Rational empiricism has NOTHING to say about that which is not observed, other than
patrice
Feb 2012
#24
And yet the idea that I adhere to something called "rational empiricism" is an assumption.
darkstar3
Feb 2012
#27
My assumption is based upon the value that you apparently place on observation. nt
patrice
Feb 2012
#29
Thank you, cbayer. It is the only thing that makes this bearable. My dachshunds live
roguevalley
Feb 2012
#59
Thank you, Darkstar3. I hug you back too. What a strange thing to come into a
roguevalley
Feb 2012
#58
Our senses known and to be known help us understand nature composed of energy and matter. We know
jody
Feb 2012
#15
Isn't that the basis of faith, a belief that does not require energy and matter and is not a cause
jody
Feb 2012
#51
Not sure why I need faith. What we call "reality" seems enough, to me. Did you see that
patrice
Feb 2012
#52
Speaking of dogma: I think you don't KNOW crap about what I think. Q.Proof of YOUR hidden ideology?
patrice
Feb 2012
#79
This statement is one of the many reasons I dislike Lewis as a thinker.
ChadwickHenryWard
Feb 2012
#60