Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(15,233 posts)
56. Did you scan the book for the word "God"?
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 05:53 PM
Feb 2012

How about "religion", "spirituality", "faith"? I find it difficult to limit the possible interpretations of a book based on scanning for a word. I did, however, scan for the word "God". It's there, a number of times. An excerpt from page 212 - 213:

...

Though less conspicuously, a belief in oneness is part of the Judeo-Christian tradition as well. In 1939, as yet another shattering attempt at world domination rumbled in Europe, Jewish theologian and philosopher Martin Buber address the National Conference of Palestinian Teachers in Tel-Aviv. He concluded his address by saying, "Nothing remains but what rises above the abyss of today's monstrous problems, as above every abyss of every time: the wing-beat of the spirit and the creative word. But he who can see and hear out of unity will also behold and discern again what can be beheld and discerned eternally. The educator who helps to bring man back to his own unity will help to put him again face to face with God."

In whatever tradition they occur, spiritual practices focused on an awareness of interbeing tend to have the intriguing psychological side effect of bringing significant earthly happiness to their most devoted practitioners, almost regardless of external circumstances. In a book that is a collaboration between psychologist Daniel Goleman and His Holiness the Dalai Lama, entitled Destructive Emotions: A Scientific Dialogue with the Dalai Lama, Goleman writes, "The very act of concern for others' well-being, it seems, creates a greater state of well-being within oneself" In recent years, increasing numbers of scientists have echoed this impression. At a 2002 conference on science and the mind attended by the Dalai Lama, distinguished Australian neurobiologist Jack Pettigrew remarked, "If you go to Dharamsala [Indian home of the Tibetan community in exile], you go up through the fog in mid-winter and you come out in the bright sunshine, it's like going to heaven. What strikes you immediately is the happy smiling faces of the Tibetans, who don't have much, have been terribly deprived, and yet they are happy. Well, why are they happy?"

The Dalai Lama himself is interested in answering this question scientifically and finding a secular way to creat the compassionate sense of interbeing that is achieved by devour practitioners of Tibetan Bhuddist meditation. To this end, he has launched an international series of dialoques between scientists and Bhuddist scholars, the most recent of which, in 2003, was cosponsored by the Mind and Life Institute in Colorado and the McGovern Institute of the Massachussetts Institute of Technology. He intends these dialogues to yield practical solutions to the destructive states of mind that both the Bhuddists and the scientists view as the root of human confilct and suffering.

As a psychologist, I am particularly taken with the Dalai Lama's description of those whom I might refer to as sociopaths, or as people devoid of an intervening sense of obligation based in connectedness to others. He refers to such people as "people who don't have well developed human lives." More specifically, the Dalai Lama said of the World Trade Center attacks, "Technology is a good thing but the use of technology in the hands of people who don't have well developed human lives can be disastrous."

...


Now, do I think this chapter says that sociopaths are usually atheists? No. Do I think that Denzel Washington, looking back at the book and after having played his character as a sociopath and atheist could remember it that way? Yes. I've done enough checking of my recollections to know that they are not exact. I've read that is normal for human memory. Denzel plays the character, apparently a character under threat of immediate death as an atheist. Do I think the character's atheism is important to how Denzel plays him? Yes. IOW, I think this is much ado about nothing.

After all, I could start a thread that claims Denzel Washington associates winners with sociopaths - but, that would be silly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I did not have any outrage when I clicked on the link. I found it curious, not outrageous. MADem Feb 2012 #1
And WHOOOSH goes the point flying over your head. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #3
No, it did not fly over my head. Ever hear the phrase "...and words will never hurt me?" MADem Feb 2012 #5
Again, you are missing the point. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #7
No, I'm not missing the point. MADem Feb 2012 #13
Wow, the denial is stupefying. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #15
No, but the urge to start a mindless and pointless argument is strong with you, I see. MADem Feb 2012 #16
Are you trying to convince me or yourself? cleanhippie Feb 2012 #18
You ARE missing the point - deliberately, I suspect. mr blur Feb 2012 #26
You are wrong. I won't go into snarky "par for the course" remarks--that's your schtick. MADem Feb 2012 #27
Uh, you ARE missing the point. Warpy Feb 2012 #17
Try reading what I wrote. nt MADem Feb 2012 #19
Why do you always seem to assume that someone who disagrees with you didn't read what you wrote? laconicsax Feb 2012 #21
Because you plainly didn't read it--I never approached the subject from a position of being "right." MADem Feb 2012 #23
One last attempt. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #57
Because *I* plainly didn't read it? laconicsax Feb 2012 #68
I was replying to you, and your assertion. So yes, I do keep track. nt MADem Feb 2012 #70
Since when does a question constitute an assertion? laconicsax Feb 2012 #71
Your "questions" (rhetorical demands) were based on your wrong assumption that MADem Feb 2012 #75
I accept your apology. laconicsax Feb 2012 #82
You really didn't read what I wrote! MADem Feb 2012 #85
That point Dorian Gray Feb 2012 #32
I don't think that is the case here on DU Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #39
Maybe Dorian Gray Feb 2012 #44
No, words will never hurt me Scootaloo Feb 2012 #25
Ah, the hyperbole over a straw man is strong, here! nt MADem Feb 2012 #28
Just making a point Scootaloo Feb 2012 #49
Well, there's a difference of opinion about that on this thread. MADem Feb 2012 #60
"Every single "quote" from the man provided here Rob H. Feb 2012 #64
Actually, it's very plain Scootaloo Feb 2012 #67
Well, Denzel had best watch his step then, is that what you're saying? MADem Feb 2012 #72
Tiller's actions? REALLY? darkstar3 Feb 2012 #73
Stop struggling to be poutraged--of course his actions were legal. Do I need to say "Duh?" MADem Feb 2012 #76
There it is. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #78
What part of "Don't let the opinions of actors ruin your day" is unclear to you? MADem Feb 2012 #80
No, I'm saying Denzel said something offensive Scootaloo Feb 2012 #83
I am not "peddling excuses" for anyone. Jeez. RIF. nt MADem Feb 2012 #84
That's the most ironically rich thing I've read in days Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #87
Yeah, sure, whatever floats your little boat. Have one of those nice days. nt MADem Feb 2012 #89
Nice passive-aggressive response. "little boat" Nice. Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #90
Are you at least breaking a sweat with all of that ducking and dodging? Silent3 Feb 2012 #50
Don't ascribe motives to me--you'd be quite wrong, as you are. MADem Feb 2012 #59
I may not be able to completely determine your motives... Silent3 Feb 2012 #61
I am not asking you to "buy" anything. Sheesh. Get over yourself. MADem Feb 2012 #74
It's also a smart practice to realize how... Silent3 Feb 2012 #79
You have a nice day. Find someone else to play with. nt MADem Feb 2012 #81
I had a similar reaction Dorian Gray Feb 2012 #31
+1 nt MADem Feb 2012 #77
I don't see him doing any such thing. MrSlayer Feb 2012 #2
Sorry, you have it wrong. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #4
I think you are reading it the way you want. MrSlayer Feb 2012 #14
And to add fuel to the fire, it's "The Examiner" which means some bozo wrote it the way they wanted. MADem Feb 2012 #20
The interview does not support your claim.... xocet Feb 2012 #22
Oh, come on. Why does he list it there if it isn't important to the rest. Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #40
Well.... xocet Feb 2012 #106
No, it would be your incorrect application of logic there. Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #107
See other interviews linked in #51 and #55/#58 muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #108
I have no more rage with his comments than I do when you belittle and humblebum Feb 2012 #6
Ah, humblebum. If we could only be as pious as you. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #9
You are one of those that has claimed you would call out bigotry Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #41
Really? So what did I express in #6? nt humblebum Feb 2012 #42
Passive-Aggressivity? Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #43
You seem to be attempting to either read things into or to twist words. humblebum Feb 2012 #45
Yes, you're right Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #46
Not much different than saying humblebum Feb 2012 #47
If Denzel is saying that conscience cannot exist without piety, he needs to do a LOT more reading. rocktivity Feb 2012 #8
No, he is saying that a conscience cannot exist without piety. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #10
I mis-wrote -- was editing while you were responding. n/t rocktivity Feb 2012 #12
Substitute "believer in string theory" for atheist. Still think it's not biased? saras Feb 2012 #11
I am still trying to make sense of your post. pennylane100 Feb 2012 #24
+1 nt MADem Feb 2012 #29
You and others are STILL missing the point skepticscott Feb 2012 #30
again my question to you is pennylane100 Feb 2012 #48
Denzel Washington's wording does not imply a mere "happens to be"... Silent3 Feb 2012 #86
The replies to this thread are hilarious. Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #33
It is amazing how they are noticably absent. For all of their handwringing and bloviating... cleanhippie Feb 2012 #34
Frankly I believe its because they agree with Denzel, its not prejudice if its true... Humanist_Activist Feb 2012 #62
So your response to the bigoted statement of Denzel Washington Leontius Feb 2012 #93
I'm just making an observation on behavior, considering how... Humanist_Activist Feb 2012 #98
Well then I guess the only thing I can do is apologize Leontius Feb 2012 #101
Considering your own posting history on separation of church and state... Humanist_Activist Feb 2012 #102
Distortion and outright falsehoods are not good traits to display in public. Leontius Feb 2012 #103
Sorry, got you confused with Kurmudgeon... Humanist_Activist Feb 2012 #104
No problem Leontius Feb 2012 #105
Par for the course. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #66
Denzel is an asshole soleft Feb 2012 #35
Hope you didn't hurt yourself making that leap.... Sal316 Feb 2012 #36
Its not a leap, sal. Its as plain as day. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #38
Actually, I do get your point. Sal316 Feb 2012 #91
No, you don't get it at all. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #94
No, it's not about the character; look at the other quotes muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #100
As an atheist, I say "Fuck you, Denzel." [nt] Jester Messiah Feb 2012 #37
"The traits of a sociopath: No conscience, no sense of remorse, usually atheist ..." Jim__ Feb 2012 #51
Since the book characterises 4% of Americans as sociopaths muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #52
wikipedia: ... the number of people in the US who don't believe in a god to be about 9%. Jim__ Feb 2012 #53
Even to claim 22% of those who do not believe in god are sociopaths muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #54
Did you scan the book for the word "God"? Jim__ Feb 2012 #56
I scanned it for 'god', and also read the 'spirituality' section, after looking at the index muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #58
I think he just makes these connections , religious= predominatly moral , atheist= predominatly Leontius Feb 2012 #63
Here's what he said in another interview, and it's unambiguous Rob H. Feb 2012 #55
There are atheists and then there are atheists . mia Feb 2012 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author laconicsax Feb 2012 #69
You know you're spelling that wrong. Goblinmonger Feb 2012 #88
Thanks mia Feb 2012 #97
Ha...the funny thing is, I was about to come on here and defend religious people. Evoman Feb 2012 #92
Apparently the only problem is you Silent3 Feb 2012 #95
Did you reply to the wrong post? cleanhippie Feb 2012 #96
No, I was just being sarcastic... Silent3 Feb 2012 #99
"an atheist, a murderer and liar" != "a murderer and a liar because he is an atheist" ButterflyBlood Feb 2012 #109
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Denzel Washington associa...»Reply #56