Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,177 posts)
37. It's not my OP. And my #13 was a response to #12, which sought to blame the entire matter
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 02:58 PM
Oct 2013

on the Roman Catholic church: in #13, to which you responded, I merely pointed out that Winans was not Catholic, and the mother whose child Winans refused to baptize didn't seem to be Catholic either

Although I'm not Catholic myself, I object to Catholic-bashing in this forum. That's not the same as thinking it would be in any way worthwhile to indulge your so-called "interest" in Christianity by discussing with you the "question" you asked in your #33: namely, Why would someone think their baby needs this ritual so badly that they would wander from church to church?

IMO your claim to want "discussion" is nothing but bottom-dragging in hopes you'll get some reaction that somehow gratifies you

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So much for ... rustysgurl Oct 2013 #1
No kidding gopiscrap Oct 2013 #4
I am an agnostic but have a fairly good knowledge of the bible pennylane100 Oct 2013 #2
I think the best thing to do is to shine light on him. cbayer Oct 2013 #5
Does that hold for mosques and temples, as well? Igel Oct 2013 #19
"Whosoever shall receive one such child in my name receiveth me." Matthew 18:5 raging moderate Oct 2013 #26
Another is "The Sabbath is made for man, not man for the Sabbath" Mark 2:27 Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2013 #38
I totally agree gopiscrap Oct 2013 #3
Mr Winans could notice that our Saint Mary was in a family way irregularly too and that struggle4progress Oct 2013 #6
The irony here is absurd, isn't it. cbayer Oct 2013 #7
I suspect him, at least, of being an uninspired reader of his texts, which seem to me struggle4progress Oct 2013 #8
"it’s not faith that is to blame here." dimbear Oct 2013 #9
Pope Francis on .. unmarried mothers ... (Guardian 13 Mar 2013) struggle4progress Oct 2013 #10
Of course none of this would matter skepticscott Oct 2013 #12
Winans doesn't seem to be Catholic, and the Pope's statements predate the Charity Grace case struggle4progress Oct 2013 #13
Who said I was talking about Charity Grace? Obviously I wasn't. skepticscott Oct 2013 #14
#10 is a quote from the current Pope back when he was still Archbishop: the full quote does not struggle4progress Oct 2013 #15
Whether or not his faith is "standard" is irrelevant Act_of_Reparation Oct 2013 #16
"misrepresentation in #9 of Winans' attitude as standard Christian faith" ? dimbear Oct 2013 #17
My comments in #12 bear NO relation to the story in #11? skepticscott Oct 2013 #18
What people do you know have "hysterical fears about needing to get their children baptized"? rug Oct 2013 #20
Skepticscott has nothing substantial to add Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2013 #39
Why is it important for a child to be baptized? Bradical79 Oct 2013 #33
I can't see much point to arguing with you on this subject: you're certainly free struggle4progress Oct 2013 #35
You brought it up Bradical79 Oct 2013 #36
It's not my OP. And my #13 was a response to #12, which sought to blame the entire matter struggle4progress Oct 2013 #37
s4p, you're the one who brought the pope's position into the discussion! trotsky Oct 2013 #40
Why is it Catholic bashing skepticscott Nov 2013 #41
Such an exciting conversational prospect! You promise to regard whatever I say as an amusing dodge! struggle4progress Nov 2013 #42
And you come through like a trooper skepticscott Nov 2013 #43
+1000 nt PassingFair Oct 2013 #23
Pope calls single mother, offers to baptize her child (Sept 2013) struggle4progress Oct 2013 #11
I'm so glad Catholic clergy pulled this sort of BS when my father wanted me baptized. AtheistCrusader Oct 2013 #21
There are other churches who will welcome the mother and child. No Vested Interest Oct 2013 #22
Emperor Constantine, called Constantine the Great and a Saint in the Eastern Church was dimbear Oct 2013 #24
Actually, it's very doubtful okasha Oct 2013 #25
That Bronze Age book Mr. Winans thinks he follows says ALL people are sinners, one way or another. raging moderate Oct 2013 #27
Godly rebuke is not judgmental… sophia_petty Oct 2013 #28
Welcome to the religion room. As a Christian I find it more important that the clergy show the love hrmjustin Oct 2013 #29
LOL trotsky Oct 2013 #30
Jesus was conceived outside of wedlock, and only because Joseph was a Godly man.... moriah Oct 2013 #31
welcome to DU gopiscrap Oct 2013 #32
In order to decide whether or not to rebuke, the pastor must judge whether or not he thinks it neede uppityperson Oct 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pastor’s denial of baby d...»Reply #37