Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheist group changing its message [View all]

Members of the Secular Student Alliance set up next to the Alpha Omicron Pi fraternity in the Sombrilla area of the University of Texas San Antonio main campus, Monday, Oct. 28, 2013. Some are former members of the Atheist Agenda, a group that drew controversy for their, "Smut for Smut" campaign in which student were asked to turn in religious books for pornography. At the Secular Student Alliance table are from left, Jesse Silva, 18, Jacob Schmidt, 20 and Charles Duncan, 24.
By Abe Levy : November 1, 2013 : Updated: November 1, 2013 10:02pm
Since 2005, in-your-face atheism had a platform at the University of Texas at San Antonio in a student organization known for its Smut for Smut campaign.
In the campus' free-speech area, Atheist Agenda exchanged free porn for Bibles, Korans and any religious book held dear.
The group's message was that religions are more damaging than Hustler magazine.
The yearly event was low-hanging fruit for news outlets nationwide and abroad. The irreverence sparked lively debate and occasional security. Evangelical Christian groups counter-demonstrated. Muslim students confronted. Not the most flattering publicity by design.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/religion/article/Atheist-group-changing-its-message-4947906.php
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But you just said it was "tone deaf sexism", and that "you dont fight sexism with sexism."
cleanhippie
Nov 2013
#12
No, you are. They had a "smut for smut campaign" that you said was "fighting sexism with sexism."
cleanhippie
Nov 2013
#14
Yes, the answer is clear. I agree with you that the bible is a sexist as pornography.
cleanhippie
Nov 2013
#26
Denying one's own words that are there for all to see is more than odd, it's disturbed.
cleanhippie
Nov 2013
#28
Just because the tactic they used was not wise, doesn't mean the Bible lacks in sexism or...
Humanist_Activist
Nov 2013
#44
oh those poor "believers" have been hostile and agressive for 2000 years. they'll get over it nt
msongs
Nov 2013
#8
Deal. There is a spectrum and generalizations from either direction really serve no purpose.
cbayer
Nov 2013
#32
Sounds like they were on the receiving end of the hostile aggressive attitudes.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2013
#46
This change reminds me of a group of rebels reorganizing into a political party.
dimbear
Nov 2013
#39