Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
18. Even more
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 04:24 PM
Sep 2012

> If you want the robot to send back some information, then it will be traceable - you take the robot apart, and work out where it would send information to.

No, you have it send radio signals back in many directions - which it would have to anyway since you would have no idea if it was upside down or whatever when it sent its signals.


> Yes, I suppose he is saying that all technological species will hide fairly quickly once they become visible.

So your theory means that 1 second after a species invents radio, they hastily shut it down?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Worth contemplating more seriously tama Sep 2012 #1
Many sci fi writers had stories where Ichingcarpenter Sep 2012 #3
It is not only prey which is silent.. Fumesucker Sep 2012 #2
Logical problem bongbong Sep 2012 #4
just because you are aggressive or able to wage war qazplm Sep 2012 #7
That's the point bongbong Sep 2012 #14
That's not a logical flaw; you just have a different point of view muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #10
Sorry, it is a logical flaw bongbong Sep 2012 #13
The 'if' premise is not part of what Gato-Riviera suggests muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #15
More bongbong Sep 2012 #16
What would be the point of self-replicating robots, if they can't be traced? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #17
Even more bongbong Sep 2012 #18
'fairly quickly' in terms of astronomical time muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #21
And .... bongbong Sep 2012 #22
A couple of alternatives. longship Sep 2012 #5
Our existence is no more than an accident. dipsydoodle Sep 2012 #6
One problem with the "Beserker" explanation ThoughtCriminal Sep 2012 #8
Greg Bear is pleased. sofa king Sep 2012 #9
Good idea to put out there, but I don't buy it caraher Sep 2012 #11
Perhaps more advanced civilizations have moved beyond scattershot radio broadcasts ... eppur_se_muova Sep 2012 #12
Never a fan of the Fermi Paradox because it assumes three things: Phoonzang Sep 2012 #19
Even more doubt on aliens bongbong Sep 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The Fermi paradox vs the...»Reply #18