Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,480 posts)
21. 'fairly quickly' in terms of astronomical time
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 04:50 PM
Sep 2012

If you shut down radio emissions with a century or two, you're not taking up much time compared to the age of the galaxy, or the time it takes to travel around (if the speed of light really is limiting, which I assume it is).

Any self-respecting robot (and I think a self-replicating one would also be self-respecting ) could use stars to orient itself so it would know which direction home is. Yes, I suppose you could broadcast in every direction (though it offends my sense of efficiency), but, if I was worried about aggressive species, I think I'd worry they'd be able to trace the route of a robot back, somehow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Worth contemplating more seriously tama Sep 2012 #1
Many sci fi writers had stories where Ichingcarpenter Sep 2012 #3
It is not only prey which is silent.. Fumesucker Sep 2012 #2
Logical problem bongbong Sep 2012 #4
just because you are aggressive or able to wage war qazplm Sep 2012 #7
That's the point bongbong Sep 2012 #14
That's not a logical flaw; you just have a different point of view muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #10
Sorry, it is a logical flaw bongbong Sep 2012 #13
The 'if' premise is not part of what Gato-Riviera suggests muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #15
More bongbong Sep 2012 #16
What would be the point of self-replicating robots, if they can't be traced? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #17
Even more bongbong Sep 2012 #18
'fairly quickly' in terms of astronomical time muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #21
And .... bongbong Sep 2012 #22
A couple of alternatives. longship Sep 2012 #5
Our existence is no more than an accident. dipsydoodle Sep 2012 #6
One problem with the "Beserker" explanation ThoughtCriminal Sep 2012 #8
Greg Bear is pleased. sofa king Sep 2012 #9
Good idea to put out there, but I don't buy it caraher Sep 2012 #11
Perhaps more advanced civilizations have moved beyond scattershot radio broadcasts ... eppur_se_muova Sep 2012 #12
Never a fan of the Fermi Paradox because it assumes three things: Phoonzang Sep 2012 #19
Even more doubt on aliens bongbong Sep 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The Fermi paradox vs the...»Reply #21