Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

caraher

(6,356 posts)

4. Thanks everyone

Reply to caraher (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:25 PM

Jan 2012

I wound up unable to go, though I did spend considerable time formulating remarks basically pointing out that creation science is not science and questioning why one would ask public school science teachers to teach religion.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Testimony against creation science bill [View all] caraher Jan 2012 OP

Kitzmiller v. Dover; QED. (nt) Posteritatis Jan 2012 #1

That statement is so vague that it may be difficult to argue against it. Jim__ Jan 2012 #2

Creation science is not in ANY way "science", it is... MarkCharles Jan 2012 #3

Thanks everyone caraher Jan 2012 #4

That creation "science" is simply not science, it's religion Warpy Jan 2012 #5

Yup caraher Jan 2012 #6