Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)

18. Yes, saw that in the article.

Reply to jakeXT (Reply #17)

Sun May 5, 2013, 03:01 PM

May 2013

Surely she must have thought people would not find her project convincing without doing such a scientific blind test. I hope the Smithsonian wasn't bamboozeled, but, dang it, why didn't they require that before running this article?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Awesome or somewhat creepy? What do you folks think? [View all] Playinghardball May 2013 OP

Creepy. Lifelong Protester May 2013 #1

Hey, it's probably the world's best anti-littering campaign.... Wounded Bear May 2013 #2

This should end women smoking at least and probably homophobes too Fumesucker May 2013 #3

I missed the connection JimDandy May 2013 #20

creepy... also frickin weird ... and... Bannakaffalatta May 2013 #4

It's crawsome. RevStPatrick May 2013 #5

hokum.. How can this science even exist yet? annabanana May 2013 #6

Agreed. I am quite skeptical of this alleged breakthrough. n/t Laelth May 2013 #8

another vote for hokum. mopinko May 2013 #12

The article clearly says what markers she gets and uses, so... TreasonousBastard May 2013 #14

I find this so fascinating. Frustratedlady May 2013 #7

I'm going with extremely creepy. nt Live and Learn May 2013 #9

Awesome. mzteris May 2013 #10

Totally creepy. Buzz Clik May 2013 #11

Creepy sakabatou May 2013 #13

I'd be more interested in seeing how close he's getting Warpy May 2013 #15

The only way I'd buy into this JimDandy May 2013 #16

She made one of her, but that's not scientific jakeXT May 2013 #17

Yes, saw that in the article. JimDandy May 2013 #18

Just in that example the eye color and the shape of her eyebrows are off jakeXT May 2013 #19