Economists say we are producing more STEM graduates than we have jobs for [View all]

[eridani]

http://www.dcvelocity.com/articles/20130507-the-stem-debate/

Yet a number of economists now argue that while many employers see a dearth of STEM professionals, the nation actually doesn't have enough jobs for the graduates we are producing. Paul Beaudry, an economist from the University of British Columbia, argued in a paper he and colleagues published in January that the demand for skilled workers in the U.S. began to decline in about the year 2000—not coincidentally at the time of the big dot-com bust.

Why the contradiction? If Beaudry and his co-authors are correct, the decline has been hidden from view by the peculiar way it has played out. In their paper, "The great reversal in the demand for skill and cognitive tasks," they wrote, "In response to this demand reversal, high-skilled workers have moved down the occupational ladder and have begun to perform jobs traditionally performed by lower-skilled workers. This de-skilling process, in turn, results in high-skilled workers' pushing low-skilled workers even further down the occupational ladder and, to some degree, out of the labor force all together." Or, as he recently said during an interview on the superb radio program Marketplace, "I wouldn't want to exaggerate—it's not like everyone is getting a barista job, but that's exactly the feeling. It's kind of like this pushing down." So the lack of good jobs for the mostly highly trained STEM professionals plays out in under- or unemployment for those with the fewest skills.

This is important to material handling, logistics, and supply chain management. Jobs in these professions are becoming increasingly technical, and the tools that support them are becoming increasingly complex. If the next generation of potential STEM graduates perceives—accurately or not—that job prospects in those areas aren't promising and turn to management consulting or, heaven forfend, Wall Street, we have a problem.