Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

In reply to the discussion: Tornado Theory [View all]
 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
15. Didn't really get that from your other posts, but in terms of genesis of a tornado, I'd say no.
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 03:01 PM
Jun 2013

A column of water could not form without an already existing vortex. Something needs to exist to condense and concentrate that water vapor, so the water can not be the initiator.

Liquid water, added to high velocity wind, increases it's density, therefore it's potential to do damage, but you can't get a column of liquid water in the air without wind to gather it.

I think that the people who study tornadoes would have long ago discovered the "virtual bathtub" of water that is inherent in your theory.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Tornado Theory»Reply #15