Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. Right!
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:04 PM
Jun 2013
we should stress that they still don’t know exactly what’s going on inside the sealed steel cylinder reactor.


While Rossi hasn’t provided much in the way of details — he’s a very secretive man...


In NASA’s tests, it takes a lot more energy to fuse the nickel and hydrogen than is produced by the reaction. Rossi, it would seem, has discovered a secret sauce that significantly reduces the amount of energy required to start the reaction. As for what the secret sauce is, no one knows


Science by hiding secrets isn't science. It is, however, a common trait for quackery. "I've got this secret formula to make this thingamabob do this thingamajig, but it's secret and I'm not going to tell you what it is. But if you help fund my research you'll be in on the ground floor of something really big."

Of course, the article you cite ends like this:
If Rossi and Focardi’s cold fusion technology turns out to be real — if the E-Cat really has 10,000 times the energy density and 1,000 times the power density of gasoline — then the world will change, very, very quickly. Stay tuned; we’ll let you know when — or if — the E-Cat passes peer review.


Bingo! No peer review yet. And we know what peer review did for Pons and Fleischman.

I'll stand by my post. Cold fusion kooks!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Fusion? I'm not too sure about it. longship Jun 2013 #1
"cold fusion kooks claim" ...Nice to see you've no preconceptions Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #2
Right! longship Jun 2013 #3
It's very simple. Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #4
But one cannot claim a science break through without peer review. longship Jun 2013 #5
If it's real, then it's about the profit. Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #6
Well, if it's real. longship Jun 2013 #8
Again if it's real publishing is the least of the issues. So is getting a Nobel Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #11
My point is that it isn't science longship Jun 2013 #13
Doesnt nessacariy have to be fraud, although I know your Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #15
I am not committed to "fraud" charge. longship Jun 2013 #18
Understandable sentiment Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #19
The GOAL is to produce electricity from a reaction and the ONLY byproduct is nutrinos. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #9
cold fusion is a delusion kiri Jun 2013 #7
Never say never. secondvariety Jun 2013 #16
Why isn't America leading this important research? tclambert Jun 2013 #10
The US had a research-program for a pulsed fusion-reactor. DetlefK Jul 2013 #20
The US has it's own research groups. Angleae Jul 2013 #22
We could build three of them for what we spent in 1 year on the Iraq War phantom power Jun 2013 #12
We could build ten secondvariety Jun 2013 #14
Seem to be missing Something Here packman Jun 2013 #17
All national supply-grids are tuned towards centralized procuction of electricity. DetlefK Jul 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Inside The Most Expensive...»Reply #3