Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

(26,624 posts)

1. So if Shechtman's conclusions about nature were eventually proven correct, might not those mystics

Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:46 PM

Feb 2012

who saw an afterlife, a preternatural complement to nature to which we are linked by senses of the physical, might they not also be correct?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Nobel Prize-Winning Discovery that Got a Scientist Kicked Out of His Own Lab [View all] n2doc Feb 2012 OP

I don't think so. mysuzuki2 Feb 2012 #6

One difference between quasicrystals and an afterlife mindwalker_i Feb 2012 #7

Sorry I claimed nothing. nt jody Feb 2012 #9

Schectman did pretty much exactly the opposite of mystics caraher Feb 2012 #10

Well done, thank. Scuba Feb 2012 #12

In the same way that people who thought the Earth was flat might be Motown_Johnny Feb 2012 #11

And Struggling Culinary Enthusiasts Have Never Looked Back Thaddeus Kosciuszko Feb 2012 #5