Science
In reply to the discussion: Quantum Entanglement, Dark Counts, Coincidence Detection [View all]napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)If you are correct, than 1 of 2 things is true:
A) You and that professor you are fond of saw something that Heisenberg, Bohr, Einstein and all the rest missed...or
B) You and that prof saw something that all these other brilliant men saw, but chose not to comment on due to their ties to the intelligence community.
The NSA has publicly stated that their intelligence gathering model is based on capturing signals in transit, not compromising individual computers. That means that if you were to discover a method of non-local communication and make it publicly available, that would the potential to shut down their whole model. Snowden warned of things they are doing, but yet they still persist in doing them, and probably will continue to. However, publicly available non-local communication would shut them down entirely. You would do the damage to the NSA of 10,000 Edward Snowdens if you were the one who released this info. That would not be without consequences.
I'm not trying to spook you, I am 1000% behind science as public endeavour, and I hope you will continue. Just be smart. Moving in undiscovered areas of science has big consequences, ever since a few nuclear physicists discovered some funny properties of some Uranium isotopes. I'm just asking you not to get so into the equations that you lose the context of your work...
PEace, and good luck with the experiments! I hope you will post more here as you learn more!
Nir