Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lugal Zaggesi

(366 posts)
3. 2013 is certainly too early to rule out FTL travel as "impossible"
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:28 AM
Jul 2013

But I wouldn't expect much progress in the next 200 years.

I'd be much happier if they just threw some serious resources towards former astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz's VASIMR propulsion system:
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1006/01vasimr/

That's doable, right now.
Fission power on spaceships - that's doable, right now.

Fusion power on spaceships - hopefully that's doable within 30 years.
Get to 1/10 the speed of light this century, and I'll be impressed. 1/2 c, and I'd be floored.

Get to work on antimatter as a way for storing energy for starships - I'll be even more impressed this century.
http://www.space.com/17537-antimatter-fusion-engines-future-spaceships.html
(although this technology would probably be commandeered by the Generals for awesome weapons - let's not destroy Humanity before we reach the stars, shall we ?)

This century, if they can get some spaceships to the Kuiper Belt (30 to 50 AU away from Sun, about 7 light-hours) - I'll be happy.

Faster-than-light travel - if they make NO progress till the 22nd century, I won't be surprised.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Nasa experiment: Is faste...»Reply #3