Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

soniasharp

(2 posts)
13. First stage (kinda)
Sun Oct 13, 2013, 12:04 AM
Oct 2013

Well, essentially the same landing method can be used in landing both first and second stages. But Grasshopper was specifically intended to simulate the Falcon 9 first stage tank. Second stage recovery is a little more difficult naturally, since it has to deal with larger speeds and harsher atmospheric re-entry conditions than the first. Have to start somewhere.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So fucking awesome. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #1
Energy expenditure BlueStreak Oct 2013 #4
Actually I think Tesla has been pretty successful. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #5
He has fundamentally miscalculated the energy capacity of battery storage BlueStreak Oct 2013 #7
Give the guy a little credit. He put together an orbital-capable launch operation in the space Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #9
+1 architect359 Oct 2013 #17
Actually, his attitude is, "I know the laws of physics" caraher Oct 2013 #6
Just to be clear, that's a Bachelor's degree. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #8
Not a completely controlled descent soniasharp Oct 2013 #10
So which stage is this test simulating? BlueStreak Oct 2013 #11
First stage (kinda) soniasharp Oct 2013 #13
Welcome to DU. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #16
Welcome to DU gopiscrap Oct 2013 #15
Looks kind of old fashioned. Kablooie Oct 2013 #2
Or in Ray Bradbury books... hunter Oct 2013 #12
Rockets could do this for real in the 1960s BlueStreak Oct 2013 #14
Holy Shit!!!!! Cooley Hurd Oct 2013 #3
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»SpaceX Grasshopper 744m T...»Reply #13