Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think it should be named Tyrannasaurus onepercentus LiberalEsto Nov 2013 #1
great idea IrishAyes Nov 2013 #2
I bet . . . HuskyOffset Nov 2013 #3
Did he... JimboBillyBubbaBob Nov 2013 #4
How do they know it was "just a juvenile?" Demoiselle Nov 2013 #5
Limb proportions, bone structure, general wear-and-tear that got fossilized, etc Posteritatis Nov 2013 #8
Epiphyseal plates Xithras Nov 2013 #9
Interesting! Thanks! burrowowl Nov 2013 #6
wow allan01 Nov 2013 #7
Poor T-Rex.... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #10
Not so badly as the poor old Brontosaurus! Quasimodem Nov 2013 #11
I love this video on it... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #12
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»‘Colossal’ New Species of...»Reply #1